As a huge Star Trek fan, I've always loved "Evolution" from the season three premiere. The next generation. The third season is basically TNG finally leveling up, complete with new uniforms and a new, character-centric approach to storytelling that has changed the franchise for the better. Plus, "Evolution" has everything that made Trek's Golden Age so special, which is why I'm shocked that the creators behind this killer episode thought it was mostly mediocre.
"Evolution" plot
If you're a Star Trek fan who needs a quick "evolution" primer, here you go: this episode follows an eccentric scientist as the Enterprise hopes to track and record data on a once-in-196-year cosmic event. Meanwhile, Beverly Crusher is back on the ship trying to connect with her son Wesley, but he's focused on his studies. So focused, in fact, that he accidentally lets some nanites out and contaminate the core of the ship. As critters evolve, they test this time-sensitive, and well TNG Fashion, diplomacy ends up saving the day in this new lifestyle.
As I said to myself, I thought so. great Star Trek Room. It's not the best in the franchise or anything, but "Evolution" is arguably the strongest season premiere, compared to "Shades of Grey," a clip that seems stronger than the revenge show that ended Season 2. That's why I'm so. The creators behind the show were surprised to find it mediocre, starting with showrunner and general TNG savior Michael Peeler.
The beginning of the middle season
Star Trek showrunner though writing "It's still an evolution," Peeler concluded. "It's alright," he lamented, "I didn't like it yet." While stating that he is still "proud of the show," Peeler concluded by saying, "The show is not completely out."
Veteran Star Trek director Winryk Kolbe was in charge of bringing this episode to life, and he shared Piller's assessment of the show's mediocrity. He initially praised the plot about a scientist who "suddenly discovers there are problems he hadn't thought of" and said he "loved it" because there was "a certain amount of immaturity, chicken or whatever." However, he felt that "everyone thought it was a kid's show, even the writers", which was a "very serious issue" (these nanites could have easily destroyed the Enterprise and threatened the Federation) that was "not properly handled" on screen. .
Kolbe is one of the most reliable Star Trek directors, and Piller is more or less a survivor. The next generation Since the death spiral of the first two seasons, however, I can't get behind the criticism of "evolution." He gave us the perfect. Original series Set up with the amazing scientist and the space event, but added just the right thing. The next generation Picard twists it by having him save the day diplomatically, not violently. We've even seen the birth of a new life form, and if the track "Finding New Life" isn't enough, I don't know what is.
Star Trek: The Next Generation It had better episodes than "Evolution," but arguably no better season opener. Although the writer and director considered it as B-grade stuff, it is a stand-alone story, worth watching again. And considering how uneven NuTrek's heyday was, this "B" class doesn't seem like much anymore. Bright.
Source link