Quentin Tarantino's contributions in form are undeniable. "Pulp Fiction 'is one of the leading examples of the independent 90s film boom, "Inglorious Basterds" is one of the biggest anti -fascist films of the 2000s, and "Once once ... in Hollywood" is probably his best film to date. With all that he said, he is an infamous thought, who is often known for talking outside his red apple. No one will deny the indecent wealth of Tarantino's knowledge of the analyts of film history, but His arrogance can often lead to confusing and even flat wrong interpretations of other people's workas "IT" by Steven King.

King's Tom Tom in 1986 for a New England news group struggling with cosmic evil, in a clown mask named Penichen, is often considered one of his most famous stories and rightly. It is a huge text that covers all of his best and worst tendencies as a writer, much like Tarantino. However, the director of Kill Bill, however, has a strange opinion of it. In discussion of podcast for 2019 for "Eli Roth's horror history: unprecedented", Tarantino talks about how he believes King's "IT" is a "nightmare on Elm Street" on Wes Craven. He said:

"He just replaces Freddie Krueger with a penichand. It's true as he sees" Nightmare on Elm Street " -" Oh Wow, it's a truly neat idea. It's really smart. It's cool. So let me take that idea and let me do Mine Version for that. 'Now, his version of it will be a 560 -page novel. "

You can make some parallels on the surface level of King and Craven through a group of children who are tortured by a wicked evil with a loud mouth that is able to hurt them based on how much fear they stand out, but that's about it.

And Pennsyl, clown dancing and Freddie Krueger are notorious killers whose negative force affects their cities, though in many different ways. The "Elm Street" films played a little quickly and loosely with how Freddie could bring their powersBut for the most part, the trembling with razor hurts Springwood teenagers through their dreams. Meanwhile, the interdimensional clown hidden under Derry's sewer is a very current metaphysical threat in the real world. Freddie is driven by revenge, while a penichand only does it from a survival means. Even outside the other details in the universe, such as adults who are intentionally unaware of these monsters, Tarantino is wrong with "it" as a rip-off-based only on logistics of the timeline.

The original "ELM Street Nightmare" came to theaters in 1984, followed by a Romanian IT publication that hit the bookstore shelves two years later in 1986. But it's not as simple as that. For one, a 1980 profile of The Toronto Starvers He proves that King has actually begun writing his EP for four years before Elm Street came out. Although Craven certainly had ideas for deadly dreams floating in his head since the 1970s, he did not start writing by 1981. Every artist worked within their bubbles, and their work only happened to accidentally correlate thematically in small ways. No one could confuse Penichand for Freddie. So why would Tarantino impose that one waste on the other? The answer is simple: his own misinformation.

In the same interview of "History of Horror", Tarantino admitted that he was never actually Read "That." "Now, if you talked to someone who read the book ... Now I'm just repeating what they say. I didn't read the book," Tarantino says. It was supposed to be obvious that this was the case, given that he believed that "it" was about 560 pages when it was about half of its real length. At that moment of time, Tarantino never saw the minisers in 1990 with Tim Curry, so he left the 2017 movie and what other people said about King's novel. Although not a big fan of the film, he expressed an interest in seeing "IT: Chapter 2" to see how it all ended.

There is also this bizarre moment when Tarantino admits to preparing King as a great author, just to claim that Craven's script for Elm Street was not well written:

"He is a terrible writer in that regard, so he fills it full of miniatures and fills it full of good prose. And he fills it full of good writing, which is what Wes Craven has gone. Take all that take, and all the little lazy flowers that are put on it, and it is basically - it's basically a" Aa Nightmare ".

Leaving aside that King's story has covers decades (and sometimes for centuries), I will not hear defamation in terms of its involvement with the first Elm Street. It is one of the best plasian films texts for a reason. In terms of making receivables for extreme similarities between two texts, All I can say is a glass house, Quentin. Glass houses.

"That" and "Nightmare on Elm Street" are currently moving to HBO Max.