David Fincher called the first draft of the “pathetic” combat club (for good reason)

David Fincher's comic thriller in 1999 Fight Club became a controversial part of our pop culture landscape in more than 25 years since its release, but initially, the film's script had a significantly less bite. Talking to The Guardian At the 2009 British Film Institute (BFI) event, Fincher shared that the initial scenario for the "combat club" lacks the voice that will one day become one of the identifiers of the film's trademark. Fight Club just wouldn't work without Starvard Edward Norton's voices as a sad protagonist, sad cruncher of bag insurance company, known only as "narrator" or "Jackec", based on his habit of Referring to itself as various parts of the Jackeck's body Based on the article of the magazine that reads. The narration not only gives us an aceric perspective on why Jackec does the things it does, it also gives the film much of its satirical edge.

In the novel of Jacques Palachniuk "Fight Club", which featured the film, the story was fully told in the first person from the narrator's point of view. Attempting to translate books from first person to film can be as tricky as it is, and narration does not always work (The theater intersection of Blade Runner, someone?), but the "fight club" without the unusual voice of the narrator would be, as Fincher said, "pathetic".

Jackec narration is an important part of why the combat club is operating

Fincher was not kinded when he described the first draft of the "Fight Club" script, saying:

"So, we hired Jimim ULS, who went and wrote a draft of the script that had no voice in it. I read it and said, 'This is sad and pathetic. It's just sadness and people are terrible. Where are all things where he talks about what he thinks?' And he said, "Oh, that's a kind of crutch." And I said, 'No, man, that's our only chance to be sarcastic and satirical'. So he came back and put it all. "

Thank you for the goodness of Fincher's understanding of the need for a comedy movie, because without the narrative, it is really, Really Depressed. Unfortunately, even with that sense of humor, Many fans of "combat clubs" still missed their point (Tyler Darden is Tyler Darden on Brad Pitt no The hero of the story, no matter how cool it can), which is something that has It has bothered Fincher since the release of the film. It can be easy to identify with the Norton narrator version; Despite the fact that he is creep, who attends meetings of support groups for diseases that do not have, he has the same kind of gang humor that many use to survive. (Well, he also wants to stab the image of Aredar in the summer, and who can blame him?) Without it, he is just a loser who catches extremist violence when he meets Tyler on flight, and the second starts conveying his radical views of the lonely Jackec.

Fincher's instincts rescued the combat club from failure

The film version of Fight Club is one of those rare adaptations that is even better than the source material, and much of it is a Fincher that relies on satire on it. Although it may be a bit difficult to take out which of Darden's beliefs, Palachniuk, actually believes in the original novel (which is a problem because some of them are deeply harmful), It seems that Fincher fully understands Tyler Darden's mummy without looking at the character itself. Adaptation of director Fight Club is also layered and tinted, taking some of the best ideas of Palachniuk and most quoted lines of the book and making a movie that is smarter criticism of it. And, it all starts with Jackec's internal dialogue, giving us more insight into exactly what kind of disgruntled person could have fun with fists.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *