To this point it is a cliché that once a movie star will achieve some degree of success, they are starting to tell everyone that what they would really like to do is directly. Sometimes it works out. Kevin Costner won the best picture and the best director for His 1990 debut with "Dances with Wolves", And then you got Charles Lurton, whose only directorial effort, "Hunter's Night", " It is considered one of the biggest films ever made. At the other end of the spectrum, there is Dan Aircroyd and the inexplicable horror comedy debacle that is "nothing but trouble" (once titled "Valkenwania"). This was a passion for a passion for Aircroyd (he wrote and directed), and he only now begins to make sense for his debris (recently through A. Widespread Q&A quoted in stereogum).
The guideline may be a cooperation process, or it may be an act of control. And some actors do not like the director's control (both producer (a) and the editor), basically leaving the quality of their performance in the hands of others - especially if they are often contrary to some of these people during shooting. Could they really trust these people if they did not see their eye-to-performance as they shot him?
But not all Stars' ss are looking for the director's chair of the promise of the importance. Sometimes, the only way you can get a commercially risky film is to tell the studio that you will take the main character, which, in some cases, means playing aggressively against the type. This kind of courage that reviews the image is the only reason Clint Eastwood gave us masterpieces as "Unforgiven", "Perfect World" and "Bridges of Madison County". And none of these classics would be possible if he did not agree to act in "Play Mogs for Me".
Universal did not allow Clint Eastwood to direct the game fogs to me unless he starred in that
In a performance in 2003 At the BI -BI -Michael Parkinson talk to promote "Mystic River", Eastwood revealed that the only way he could get his first directorial effort "," Play Mysts for Me ", was to promise a universal study that she would star in the film. Eastwood has successfully separated from the Italian -produced Spaghetti Western who began his Hollywood film career so far, but he will do it by relied on his heavy, laconic iconography. "Play Maglie for Me" was a thriller about the jazz of jazz -Bay Area, whose feminine ways put his life in danger when one of his listeners (Great Esseca Walter) becomes dangerously obsessed with him. This was not the steering wheel material, the actor.
As we learned throughout his career, Eastwood was not precious to his personality. Played a sexually adventurous detective in The disturbing "TigropA bad police officer in "Blood Work" and a garden reverse-turn-off-mule in Mule. Obviously, the legendary actor and director did nothing to harm his film status; The film was a huge hit on the box office that proved that the audience could square vulnerably Eastwood with its display of the debt process that revealed "Dirty Harry" (which opened three months later for a business monster).
Eastwood felt that if he could get a few hits under the belt as a director, he would be free to make movies where he was behind the camera. After his second directorial effort, "High Plains Drifter" submitted to the box office, directed by William Holden and Kay Lenz in "Bris", in which he only made a disadvantage. But it was not until the 21st century, when, after entering their 70s, Eastwood was seriously called to act. He turned 95 this year and made noise about the withdrawal behind the camera. Since his latest film as a director, "Juror #2", was a terrible thriller of the courtroom, let's get back our Clint to work!
Source link