Jay-Z One step closer in his quest to have a case dismissed 2000 rape allegations against him A 13-year-old girl.
Thursday, January 2, Judge Analisa Torres The Southern District of New York granted a request from the rap mogul's attorney, Alex SpiroTo file a motion to dismiss the case on procedural grounds, per court documents shared herewith X By Legal Journalists Meghan M. Cunniff.
Spiro argued in a letter to Judge Torres on Monday, December 30 that The woman suing Jay-Z can't make a claim The rapper (real name Shawn Carter) was charged under New York City's Gender-Motivated Violence Protection Act after she complained of being assaulted by Jay-Z.
In her case, the woman — identified only as "Jane Doe" — She claimed that she was raped by Jay-Z and Sean "DD" Combs At an MTV Video Music Awards afterparty in September 2000 when she was just 13. (Both stars have denied the allegations.) A NYC law providing civil assistance to victims of gender-motivated violence went into effect in December of that year. (It was amended in December 2022 to allow a two-year window for people to come forward with historical claims that would otherwise have passed the statute of limitations.)
According to Judge Torres' decision on Thursday, Jay-Z's lawyer is allowed until February 6 to file a motion to dismiss the case. Jane Doe's attorneys have until February 28 to file opposing papers. Jay-Z has until March 14 to respond.
In a letter to Judge Torres on Monday, Spiro wrote, "As a matter of law the plaintiff cannot recover for her sole claim under the Victims of Gender-Initiated Violence Protection Act (GMV Act), because the Act has no retroactive effect".
He continued, “The plaintiff claims a violation of the GMV Act for conduct that occurred in September 2000. But the GMV Act was not enacted until December 19, 2000, three months after the FAC alleged the conduct occurred, and cannot apply retroactively to the creation. The cause of action is unavailable to the plaintiff at the time in question."
Doe's attorney, Tony BuzbyJustice wrote a letter to Torres on Tuesday, December 31, opposing Jay-Z's request to file for dismissal. Buzby wrote that "defendant's argument about the GMVA is persuasive, because it is contrary to the law's primary purpose: to make it easier for victims of gender-motivated violence to seek civil remedies in court — not, as the defendant would have it, to do. It's harder," according to court documents. to share Thursday by Cunniff.
Jay-Z's lawyer Alex Spiro is setting the record straight on his client's relationship with Sean "Diddy" Combs. “Mr. Carter has nothing to do with Mr. Combs' lawsuit or Mr. Combs. They had known each other professionally for several years," Spiro told Us Weekly and other reporters during a roundtable meeting with the press on Monday, December (...).
Judge Torres said last week court documents obtained by TMZ said That Jane Doe may remain anonymous is because she rejected Jay-Z's first attempt Case dismissed And Doe's identity is revealed. However, the judge noted that circumstances may change as the case progresses. Torres said he intends to revisit the issue if and when the case moves forward.
Doe's attorney, Buzbee, and Jay-Z are locked in their own legal battle. Jay-Z is suing Bajby, accusing him of extortion and defamation. Bazby Jay-Z has filed his own lawsuit against Roc Nation Earlier this month, the company allegedly bribed clients to file lawsuits against his firm, threatened former clients and impersonated state officials. (Roc Nation called the lawsuit "baloney.")
Source link