If you grew up in the 1990s, you heard about the infamous scene of Sharon Stone's legs in the classic of Paul Verhoven, "Basic Instinct" in one way or another. Whether it was your classmates, your friends, your cousins or your father covered your eyes at a time of panic, not knowing what was coming in that interrogation scene, somehow found out what happened in that scene. What you may not know is how that moment of Starwelles has emerged (not written in the script) and the scandalous consequences it has caused for the actress (and the director) for the coming years.

Known, Stone had hardly (In her autobiography, "The Beauty of Living twice") she was cheated by Verhoven before filming the scene, saying the director asked her to take off her panties not to reflect the lighting as they assure the actress her genitalia will not be displayed. According to her, when she saw the last occupation of the scene, she went to a projection stand, hit the director in the face, and then broke out to call her lawyer. But if you ask Verhoven (and many The journalists did), he would say none of that is not true. After denying this claim several times, the Dutch director said Stone knew exactly what he was doing. And the reason for this is that Verkhoven Told said the personal anecdote that inspired the scene. He said:

"My memory is that that (that scene) is based on the woman I met when I was a student in Leiden, at the university. She would do it - she would come to us and open her legs. My friend and I saw her doing it, so I went to her and said something like" we can see the vagina. And then she said, "Of course - that's why I do it!" "

However, it is all the water under the bridge now. Stone says he is in good conditions with Verkhoven and would work with him again if they are given a chance. And about that Scene ...

In a recent interview for Business InsiderStone was asked about her villain "Basic Instinct" and whether she would play the character again, knowing the repercussions that caused the icon. Saving that enigmatic appeal that made such a fascinating woman looking at and out of the screen, she said: She said:

"Would I do it again? We don't have to make these elections in life. I do not participate in the fantasy world in this way. What I did with what happened is exactly the way I wanted to do it. Verkhoven and I have a wonderful relationship. We both understand.

Once I had time to calm down, I didn't get him to get him out of the movie when I had a legal right. So I had a chance to do it differently, and I didn't do it because I once had a chance to retire, I understood, as the director, not the girl in the movie, which made the movie better. "

At 67, that's pretty bad, but you didn't expect anything less than the icon that ruled and renewed the erotic thriller genre In the 90's. And, if you want a deeper and more detailed explanation of how it feels about the scene that brought and fame and review, you need to check The speech he gave five years ago When GQ chose the woman of the year. Fortunately, we also don't have to wait too long to see the stone in its full glory on the big and small screen. She will appear in An upcoming sequel, "none 2", As in the third and last season of Sam Levinson Controversial teen drama, "euphoria".