The best reduction in Quentin Tarantino's murder is still impossible to see for most

Quentin Tarantino's "Kill Bill" was a story published in two parts, with "Volume 1" hit theaters in November 2003 and "Volume 2" in May 2004. The first part was A. Hyper-violent, cold, low-dialog affairSince the second installment was a talking, emotional movie that was (for some fans) a little disappointing from the action front. It seems that every volume has weaknesses that best solve the strong sides of the other. If there is only some kind of superb of "Kill Bill" that combined the two volumes in a large, independent movie!

It turns out that there is: "Kill Bill: The whole bloody affair" first shown in Cannes in 2006, and then published on limited theaters. It's over a four -hour movie that tells the whole story. Is that a little too long for the viewer's average patience? Of course, but the film is not for the average viewer. It is for Superfan Tarantino and for film critics who love the idea of playing around with the structure of the film and to study the effects.

But as many would like to see the "whole bloody affair", the film is notorious to catch the hands. After screening in Cannes, they are usually screens only in selected theaters in Los Angeles and only on certain rare occasions. Are you part of 99% of the world that does not live in Los Angeles? Well, hard happiness, because these projections are largely just happening in La.

The key to catching the screening of the 258-minute movie is simply to browse the name of it on a half-day basis. When the cinema decides to re -show the film, it usually receives a report from one of the trading magazines, which is how many fans have found out about some Recent showing at Vista Theater.

Is Kill Bill really better as a big movie?

From the moment the "whole bloody affair" was announced, fans debated whether it was really the best way to experience the film. Different volumes of volumes may seem awkward for some, but they also help make every volume feel like their own special, independent work. Sending two films in which the audience enjoyed the audience separately, it can be unreasonable, many say.

Perhaps the best way to experience the "Kill Bill" saga is to see "Volume 1", wait a little, and then "Volume 2.". Some fans think you can't properly appreciate the second part unless you get the taste of waiting that Tarantino fans had to suffer at the time.

On the other hand, there are few changes "the whole bloody affair" has Reportedly made the story a more satisfying. It is great that it reduces Clifancher's scene in Volume 1 that reveals that Beatrix's child is still alive. That scene made a good last note for "Volume 1", but mixed with a stroll in a combined film. The result of cutting is that when Beatrix first sees his daughter, it is a shock not only for her, but also for the viewer for the first time. The scene is probably far more powerful when presented in this new format.

Is the combination of two separate films (or books) always the best idea?

The debate on how to watch "Kill Bill" feels similar to the debate in the Game of Thrones by accident on how to read the fourth and fifth books in the series. Author George Rn Martin initially intended to "feast for crows" and "dragons dance" to be a giant book, but he was forced by publishing restrictions (and his lack of restraint with conspiracy) to separate the story into two. He divided the book not by chronology, but by geography; Fans still cannot decide whether this is the right decision.

In recent years, some fans have come out with the boiled leather editionwhich has several small variations. Provides fans a new order to read a chapter on both books, so you can experience books 4 and 5 as a 2,000+ pages giant EP, in chronological order. Many fans prefer this version because it provides a greater sense of volume and a stronger sense of intensity building, but other fans consider this approach a little sacrifice.

It doesn't matter if Martin initially intended to write a big book, some claim; What matters is that he ended up writing it in two and tried to make those parts feeling goals. Both books have their own special topics that explore them separately, and to ridicule them together, they can complicate it all too.

The split edition of Kill Bill was nowhere near as messy as the release of Martin's latest two books "Song of Ice and Fire", but the debate among fans remains the same. Does it really matter if Tarantino intended to be a big movieIf he does two films anyway and is convinced that everyone feels different? "The Whole Bloody Affair" is definitely a fun treatment for fans who can find screening, but perhaps the purest way to enjoy the story is to look at it in the original format it has announced.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *