This article contains spoilers for "Superman".

Breaking News: Journalism dies. It may not seem quite true for you, the beautiful and intelligent person who reads this article, but it is a sad, slow and seemingly unstoppable reality. Like any major cultural or social change, the reasons for this are numerous, but there are two main ones that pose a threat not only to the existence of the media and their employees, but for all of the planet. One is a gradual erosion of the concept of truth. Of course, every philosopher will tell you that the versions of the truth of any individuals are the same, but for many decades, credible facts and expertise consider a lot. In an era, poisoned by social media, political griffs and the arrival of you, the facts and expertise drowned from too much insidious noise. Then there is the fear of reporters about losing opportunities only to do their jobs. Too many journalists have learned the hard way that access and progress can be interrupted for those who are not considered friendly for mega-corporations or people in power.

All this is why those journalists who continue to do their jobs ethically and with integrity are so valuable and inspiring. It is only fair for art to reward its good work by providing some new role models on the screen, and this is exactly what the writer/director Jameseims Gun did with His movie "Superman" gladly on the crowd. Gunn's decision to include The Daily Planet, "Mottropolis News", where Superman/Clark Kent (David Corensvet) works alongside award -winning rapporteur Lois Lane (Rachel Brosnahan), is a kind of victory by all alone, with the director of his own. Gun even outperforms it, as Superman makes the champion Lois, Jimi Olsen (Skiller Gisondo), Perry White (Wendel Pierce), and the rest of the planet team as people who are as integral to stop the billionaire Leki's schemes.

When I talked to Gun before the Superman announcement, He told me he believed "journalism is incredibly important". His film shows that his belief is present through Superman, no more than in a crucial scene between Lois and Clark which is one of the best moments in the film. It is not only illustrative of the relationship of the duo and their individual characters, but also helps to establish many key topics on the film, the main among them that journalism, when it ends well, can save the world.

The scene in question appears early in Superman, after most of the film and main characters were set up. It is noticeable in that it is the first moment in the busy film that has set aside its time and rejoicing the intimacy between Lois and Clark, which has been revealed to socialize with each other for several months and have no secrets between them, especially not Clark's identity as Superman. In addition to this subversion of the usual Superman movie status (in which Lois is traditionally unaware of Clark's secret), it has been found that Clark, as a journalist, is a person who conducts exclusive Superman interviews for the planet. It is a way of maintaining his secret identity, of course, but as Lois points out, that essentially means that Clark acts as his personality for PR, not as an appropriate journalist. Asking to give his girlfriend what he wants, Clark agrees to allow Lois to interview Superman. Lois did not use the opportunity easily, as that journalist holds Superman's legs to the fire. It presses on a few major topics, not the least that is the recent prevention of Superman's Boravia attacking Jarhanpur, something he did without caution or authority, no matter how morally correct.

It is one of the most electrical scenes in any movie with comics and works at numerous levels. For one, it is a long scene for dialogue in the middle of a very busy blockbuster of action for superhero, rarity in itself. Gun, cinematographer Henry Braham and editors William Joy and Craig Alpert are approaching the scene, remains just as visual engagement and a good step like the rest of the film, highlighting the chemistry of Corosvet and Brosnahan. The whole scene is a slightly nahal companion of Lois's interview and Superman in Richard Donner's "Superman" The parallels and differences between moments that are almost 50 years old. The scene establishes not only the ocation between Lois and Clark, but also their basic differences and how their deep people and beliefs can be complimentary and also combat, showing how much passion there is among them. Their Benter originally reminiscent of Howard Fox's Classic "His Girl on Friday" In their wit and believer, but as their argument continues, it begins to look like something like the depth that is in "Network" by Sidney Lummet or "Jameseims L. Brooks" "broadcast news". Although the scene ends up in ideological deadlock and emotional ellipse - this is an early stage in the film, after all - it becomes brilliantly just as important to have journalistic integrity, or really just moral integrity, is on these characters and the film itself. Clark, which calls Lois "Cronkit" at the beginning of the stage, is not just a reference for pop culture of the cuff; It is a statement of a mission, a reminder that journalists were previously considered heroes.

The rest of the Superman sees Gun that follows the promise of that scene of Lois and Clark, showing how the duo, like their associates, are all heroes. During the long history of Superman on the site and the screen, it became easy to turn the artists' door behind the character to take on the journalism of Lois, Clark and the daily planet for granted. For example, after a cataclysmic problem solves Superman, the planet will publish a story on it written by Lois and/or Clark, and that is about the volume. In other words, the Daily Planet is a small factor in most Superman stories, not the main focus. Gun's film refuses to let it stand; Here, the planet's crew is not just about acting as a cover for Superman/Clark's identity, just to advocate for the average people Superman seeks to serve, or just put in trouble. They are there to be active participants in the story, with their contributions helping to preserve the metropolis just like Superman.

Lois gets most of the action, of course, going on his own search to find and save Superman from the prison in the pocket dimension of Luter, along with M -Stail (Eddie Gateghi). However, Jimi Olsen (Skiller Gysondo) plays a major role, also with his apparently irresistible charm inspired his former, Eva Tesmacher (Sarah Sampaio), to send him incriminating evidence of Luter's scheme to take over. During the last battle, while Superman does the physical work of stopping Luter, the planet's crew flies over the city on the Strail ship, working as a bullet to get the announced part of Luther. The work is viral, eventually leading to an arrested lucrator for his crimes. In a world where Luter has used Superman's reputation in the public eye, it is only appropriate journalism for the Daily Planet writers who are able to ensure justice.

The use of the "Daily Planet" characters is another example of how well Gun works with a large ensemble, giving everyone the opportunity to contribute in some way. However, it is more than that, as the scene of Lois and Clark proves. "Superman" is a movie that has a lot Frank Capri-ESK messagethe notion that A man can make a differenceNot because of the physical super powers, but thanks to how many other good people can touch and inspire them. This term lies in the heart of all good journalism, which is not done for the individual, but for the good of people and society. It may need a superhero to remind us of that. Maybe all we need is to remember that goodwill is a virtue, the truth exists and we should not fly to be a hero.

Superman is now in cinemas.