Michael Jacksondaughter, Paris JacksonHe lit the controversy by examining a number of payments made of his father. She pointed out more than $ 600,000 paid in 2018. on three law firms for what marked as "distrustful time".

The 27-year-old established payments in court documents, accusing the real estate approval of excessive bonuses without the appropriate approval of the Court.

With a hearing set for 16. July, Paris is pressing for financial transparency, even while the property defends its shares as an industry standard.

24. June 2025. Paris submitted an official judicial request that requires an explanation for more than $ 625,000 in "Premium Payments" issued by the Persheles of Michael Jackson.

Payments, paid during the six-month period in 2018. years, were performed in three legal companies, but were neither documented nor approved by the Court.

According to court documents obtained from PeopleThe payers' payments were effectively "luxurious gratuides assigned by the already well-compensated defense counsel."

The Paris lawyer claimed that these bonuses were given for "distrustful weather", which means that the job was not recorded, which is impossible to assess whether the benefits are justified.

She claimed that the property had not proved why the standard billing procedures did not follow, collecting "serious and significant issues" on whether the executors forced the legal advisor adequately.

Shortly afterwards, Michael Jackson's estate issued a response to the Parisian Brief.

Talking PeopleReal Estate Spokesman Jonathan Steinsapir defended payments, noting that they were in line with long-term real estate practice.

According to him, the business judgment of the property was the reason for his growth value. "Executors" Approval of payments to lawyers were adopted with the same business judgment that deserved this property over $ 3 billion, "he said.

"We are convinced that objectionable payments are suitable as, indeed, they are fully in line with the payment made in a decade before, and everything was approved by the trial court," Steinsapir added.

Meanwhile, the source near Jackson Estate reduced the problem, the invitation of the disputed amounts "relatively smaller bonuses" paid into three legal companies for their role in the sale of EMI catalogs in high conditions in 2018. years.

"The property, who helped those lawyers and others, bought a 10% share of EMI for $ 50,000 in 2012. years due to the contractual right with Sony," Insider explained. "In 2018. years, the stake sold almost $ 300 million!"

They emphasized that "any job in this position would be awarded to those who worked on that issue."

The source also pushed back to claims that the property was needed to retain 30 percent of lawyers on waiting for court approvals.

According to them, the Paris Legal team misinterpreted the Court's instructions.

"They simply erred and do not understand the orders of the court," he said, adding that the estate for years "paid bonuses like this lawyer for years, and all were approved without objections."

In the middle of the current question, Estate Michael Jackson submitted a petition in the Parentary Court in Los Angeles against the former late icon manager and the long-term Insider Frank Cascio.

Once a reliable friend and defense counsel, Cascoi allegedly transferred after HBO exit "Leaving Neverland" in 2019. Years.

The court document claimed that he, together with unnamed associates, threatened to invent new sexual favorable demands against Michael, unless real estate is paid.

"Mr. Casccio proudly described as part of Michael's" other family ", and repeatedly denied any job of Mr. Jackson", the real estate spokesman was discovered in a written statement Explosion.