For the past ten years or more, films of action from old schools with regular and relative heroes are slowly dying. The younger audience is no longer interested in guys like Ramon Rambo And Johnon McClane - they seem to like glossy superheroes, unrealistically qualified hit, and supernaturally powerful protagonists. We are lucky that Tom Cruise is still relentless in that the last real action hero, delivering Scax of life to life in the 60s And they brought us such grass as "Top Gun: Maverick" and protected sequels to his Loved franchise "Mission Impossible". But these are IP films with monstrous budgets behind them (and highly profitable nostalgia) than with fresh and new concepts. The more modest, low and medium-budget action films such as "Hell or High Water" by Taylor Sheridan or Jason Statam's annual machines have become comparative rarities over time.

Yes, we still get the occasional action of Nirvana experience as George Miller's Mad Max (Hughes Pat "and his spin-off" Furiosis "), but today, it's mostly capture crusaders and super agents who rule the terrain. Surprisingly, a type of urine by Sylvester Stallone, who basically owned the genre (along with his rival and friend Arnold Schwarzenegger) during the 1980s and early 90s. And he did not move away from the expression of his frustrations about becoming a cinema by action.

No matter how much the recent activities of the same are, they feel obsolete and purely funny at times (some are monstrosity with straight video with stupid plots and subordinate acting), there are many valid spots in his thinking about the way they see modern action movies and how they have changed over the years. The overwhelming use of CGI and the characters with comics that become unrealistic and over-the-view Action Heroes hit a certain chord for him. In Interview with the Hollywood reporter In 2022, the actor did not retain and vote for his irritations:

"(Great action movies are) like buying a vintage clock. Initially it was $ 35, and now it's $ 35,000. Why was it handmade. It wasn't above the top. It wasn't supernatural. It wasn't supernatural. It was something that could achieve a unique human being. Almost as narrators in his Greek tragedy.

It's hard to argue with the Tulsa King Starwear. These days, most action films are bombastic spectacles that are given to visual effects, providing a kind of fleeting fun that spoils the moment you leave the theater and probably forget within a week. It is especially true for most Marvel and DC films, but even smaller and more original shareholders such as "Novokain", "Loveube Hurts" or "Chaos" (which was not in the cinema, but you know what I mean) have very few substances above the usual offers. I, for one, would like to see the rush of those more actions of the old school (such as Jerie Saulnier viscerally exciting 'Rebel Ridge") It is backed by a distinctive but more founded hero that you can really feel and take root. Maybe that won't happen anytime soon, but I have hope - especially with the rise of Taylor Sheridan's shows that liked a large and older audience.