The latest film "Star Trek", Part 31 ", was released on Paramount+ in January 2025, disappointing paths and non-Thursday. Director Olatunde ventils threw a colorful, action, supposedly light captain film, which felt far from the basic principles of" Star Trek ". In front of "Part 31", the last movie of Trek Film film was "Star Trek Beyond" in 2016, the third (and the final?) Film in the alternative Time of Calvin. Kelvin's time frame, as Trakes can tell you, was a parallel universe in "Star Trek" where the famous USS company played newer, younger, warmer actors.

Simon Peg has replaced the late Jamesesi Dohan as Scotty, an engineer for the stability of the company and brought him a large part of the character's nervous. PEG has written memoirs about his youthful pop culture obsessions, so he was pleased as Punch associated with Star Trek. Indeed, when the time came to make "Star Trek Beyond", PEG even co-wrote the script (with Doug Jung). "Outside" stands above his immediate prophecies of Kelvin by not being so dark and aggressively, even if it is still action ahead. "Outside" was not as big a hit as his predecessors, and it effectively completed the Kelvin series. Said Paramount Recently in May 2024 that Kelvin's fourth film is still in development but I think Most trekkies are in "We will believe when we see" way of thinking.

Simon Peg commented on the future of Star Trek films A recent interview with variety with varietyWhere he said it was the next movie "Star Trek", he would like filmmakers to stay away from the tired trend to make it "nasty" or "dark". These things, he properly exceeds, are not the same as "mature".

As mentioned above, the first two films "Star Trek" in the era of Kelvin-Noni, directed by JJ Abrams in 2009 and 2013-adhered to "nasty" Ethos, driving abruptly in violence and avoiding the traditional philosophical tone "Star Trek". Unlike the films that came before them, they were very action oriented and were characterized by more fights and destruction (especially "Star Trek in Darkness").

Of course, "Grimm and the nasty" or "dark and gentle" became a critical buzz-fragment sometime in the mid-2000s, when more older pops were explored in more adolescent fashion, adding a strict, tone of face and dark elements of violence of characters that were previously light and fun. Some examples of this include "King Arthur" in 2004, "Batman Starts" in 2005, "Batman Starts", Casino Royal in 2006, Casino Royal, "Halloween" in 2007 and the gradual eclipse of Harry Potter's initial light films. Star Trek received the same treatment in 2009. This darkening of lightweight material was essentially a way to allow adolescents to enjoy stories that are imagined as a friendly child.

The "Starwater Trails", as PEG claims, is not a child, but there was a general perception that making a "nasty" would do so more seriously:

"These days, everything is getting very horrible. And I think this is a strange kind of justification for" How to do this job, which is essentially very youthful? "Although I would claim that the original 'Starwalks 'paths' The series was not children. It was actually quite sophisticated. Things don't have to be horrible and dark to be for adults. "

Indeed, they just have to be intelligent. It can be more mature than the violent. Although PEG probably saw what Abrams did with Star Trek, he was also probably aware of the more violent TV -Star Trek debut on Paramount+ from "Star Trek: Discovery" debuting in 2017. The pressure to make things more violent, continue with unwanted.

If Star Trek's films continue, PEG thinks they should be, in his words, careful and imaginative ... and not violent. He was a fan of the original 1966 Star Trek series and wants to regain that spirit. "Star Trek" is, after all, for pacifism. Characters should not be killed and ships are destroyed to lift the stakes, nor should anyone have a villain obsessed with revenge to make an attractive story. In the words of PEG:

"Science fiction does not have to be full of death and swearing and suspicious morality to be consumed by adults. It should only be careful and imaginative. I would like to see the" Star Trek "kind of return to the spirit of the original series a little. And we will go there on that five -year mission, even though we completed our five -year mission. So if we do another, we will do it, we will be interested in what we will follow the next.

Indeed, if Abrams "Star Trek" came out in 2009, and "above" it was in 2016, then it was already a seven -year mission.

No one knows what the movie "Star Trek" will do next, or if anyone will be made at all. Several travel movies seem to be in development, but nothing is on the immediate horizon. Paramount+ is currently working TV series called "Starflit Academy", And next season at Star Trek: Strange New Worlds will debut in July. That play, at least, has something of the spirit of the original.