A nice memory I have from seeing the reboot of the "Fantastic Four" in 2015 in theaters was a moment at the end of the loans. At one point, the screen reads: "The development and authorized distribution of this film supported over 15,000 jobs." This inspired a guy in the back of the theater to say aloud: "Well, at least something Good out of this movie! "

The comment was greeted with laughter by people who were still in the theater, because we were all pretty in line: "Fantastic Four" was not good. Nothing raging was a big movie, the one who served as another example of a 20th -century fox that none of the desired comic characters could use they had rights to. Both with critics and regular viewers, the "fantastic four" descended so bad that no one was surprised when the studio never made a sequel. The "Fantastic Four" film franchise was quietly glued once again, with fans having to wait until the upcoming restart of MCU To find out if the third time is charm.

Ereeremi Slater, a screenwriter for the film that continued to write about the ministers "Moon Knight" and "Godzilla X Kong: New Empire", seems to have no illusions about the failure of the film. In A recent interviewSlater talked about what he thinks is wrong with production. The main question? He wanted to make the "avengers" a little too. As he explained:

"('The Avengers') just came out, or the same summer or summer before. I wanted it. I thought Osos Vedon did the impossible with that film and balanced all these tones.

Slater explained that Oshosh Trans, the director, had no "avengers" like his northern star and that this "exclusion" between him and Slater was what he condemned to the project.

"Josh and I probably only saw different movies. I was more than the boy" Avengers "and, I don't want to put words in his mouth, but he was more than" Batman starts "as an ultra -basic, dark and nasty man," Sleiter said. The result was a mix of both worlds: quippendy and general weightlessness The bad movie MCU, combined with the hyper-real, zero-razem-from-mutual approach to a bad DC movie. As Slater explained further:

"The comic nature of something like" Avengers ", which I absorbed and loved all my life, he did not have the same points of touch, so the film did not land for him as he landed for me. The other thing is "Avengers" was a very expensive movie. Our budget was constantly shrinking, as the project continued.

Although Slater may not be happy with how his "Fantastic Four" scenario turned out, he looks optimistic about the new Fantastic Four, publishing in theaters on July 25. "I like the fact that they are taking a big creative swing," he told the new entrance. It is a sharp contrast to the 2015 film, which felt as if it were constantly limited by the studio trying to play safely.

However, the most exciting part of Slater is that it looks like this new movie, in fact, exploits galacutus, one of the fantastic four the most interesting villains of comics:

"I think they get the galacutus properly. I wanted to make our big bad and there was internal pressure. ... I was excited to bring a classic galacutus back and I have that Jackack Kirby design. It looked like (the new movie) did so, so I can't wait to see it in real life."