Justin Has chosen not to rebuild the claims in his countersut against him Blake Lively And Ryan RenoldsThe
The news comes a few weeks after the judge Lewis Jean Dismissed Baldoni's $ 400 million suit Lively, 37, and Renolds, against 48. It ends with us Coaster and director 41 on sexual harassment created a hostile work environment and created a memory against him after their work in the film in 2024.
The judge mentioned at the time that Baldoni could still amend his demands for a vital agreement and violation of torture intervention, but it had to be done by Monday, June 28th.
Baldoni attorney Brian Friedman Published Man On Tuesday, June 28th, the actor and the director will quit the alternative to submit any amendment. Instead, Baldoni will concentrate on the upcoming trial of Lively and Lively on December 2024 ComplaintThe
Justin Baldoni is not withdrawing from her legal battle, with her and her husband Ryan Renolds sued her with her Costar Blake Livley. Baldoni's Attorney Brian Friedman told us, "The predictable announcement of Mrs. Lively and her team's victory is false, so let's be clear about the latest judgment."
Friedman said in a statement, "The court's decision on the dismissal has no effect on the fact that there was no harassment or any memory propaganda and it did not affect our strong defense against Mrs Lively's claim," Friedman said in a statement.
Attorney continued: "The discovery is moving forward and we are confident that we will be winning against this true baseless allegation. Instead of correcting existing claims, our clients will follow the additional legal options available for us."
A spokesperson of the livestock responded to legal updates and said Our weekly In a statement on Tuesday, "The court completely canceled $ 400 million Baldney-WEFER case. In the aftermath Baldoni's lawyer said that the judge's decision to dismiss their case was not a big deal because they promised to revise and rebuild it.
Additionally, a source near the subject said Ours"At first the judge did not dismiss their case completely because Brian Friedman promised that they would revise and rebuild - and now they seem to be following other legal options. At one point their own supporters will understand that they understand that they are getting astray."
Monthly It ends with us Hit the theaters in August 2024, Lively, who was also producer in this film, Baldoni accused of sexual harassmentCreating a hostile work environment and orchestrate Smiya propaganda complaining against him in the December case.
Baldni denied all allegations against him and filed a counter -in the same month so he accused of lively, Renolds and preacher Leslie sloin Extortion, defamation and more. (Vijay and Reynolds Denies Like Sloven))
Update 5/14/25 Evening: 5: 5 A - Blake Lively's legal team has filed a new proposal to request Justin Baldoni's claim about his friend Taylor Swift, USA, USE. In the letter we received, Lively's team mentioned that Baldoni's letter was filed without "any clear support". "It should (…)
Baldoni also filed a $ 250 million libel case against New York Times For the coverage of Lively's initial allegations against him.
Judge Baldoni's case dismissed June 9 against Lively, Renolds and Slowen. He also dismissed the case New York TimesThe
“Mrs. Lively and her team's estimated announcement Victory is falseSo let's make it clear about the latest judgment, “Baldoni's Attorney Friedman Stated Ours In a statement on June 10The "Although the court rejected the demands of defamation, the court invited us to make four amendments against Mrs. Livley, which would show extra evidence and refined allegations. This case is not about the false accusations of sexual harassment and revenge and not a smart propaganda, which is not their own.
He complained, "The biggest thing is, Mrs. Lively's own claims are no truth today than yesterday, and with the truth for us, when we started this war and wait for her upcoming statement, which I am grateful for the public and exit."
Lively lawyer, already, Was shocked with the resultsGuys Ours In a statement, "Today's opinion is a complete victory and a complete reward for Blake Livley, as well as the teams of Justin Baldoni and Weefer drawn with their revengeful suit, Ryan Reynolds, Leslli Slowen and including New York TimesThe "
Attorney Esra Hudson And Mike Gotlib Continuing: "As we said from the first day, this '400 million dollar' case was a shame, and the court saw it right through.
Lively party was satisfied with the judge's verdict but they continued Fight for Taylor SwiftCommunication The actress should be protected from being used in the original test. (Swift's song "My Tears Recochet" I was usedT end with usHowever, Swift's production had no role. He was initially sub -paned by Baldoni's party but the court order was later dismissed.)
Lamp Lively denied the speed For the protective orders of Swift Exchange, the texts, including lively, say that Baldoni's team has the right to see them - but only in the film.
A spokesperson of the livestock responded to this judgment in a statement OursHe wrote, "The court has clearly denied the proposal to force the motion of the Weefer's parties to force the documents from Mrs. Livley, who has combined with the Wafer's parties. The judgment of the court's defensive order depends on the admission of the Weefers, which they had received from the Tyler Swift, which they had received from Tailor Swift.
The statement continues, “As the rest, Justin Baldoni and Wafer's party Despite already subpoured - Taylor Swift has demanded access to personal contacts and then the subpoena has been withdrawn. The crisis led by Melissa Nathan was included in their 'scene plan' document (lively revised complaint, exhibition D), and he was referred to as 'TS Fanbes' (Lively corrected) 'TSIGIDT' to amend the Lativoli (Lathava. From one day to the allegations of serious sexual harassment and revenge was nothing but annoyance from the team that he was facing. "
Lively and Baldoni trials have been determined in March 2026.
Source link