In 2010, Disney scored a goal An unexpectedly big hit with "Alice in Wonderland" by Tim Burton, " A movie that cost a significant $ 200 million to make, but which has unexplained over a billion dollars worldwide. I say "inexplicable" because the film was not very well loved by critics; Currently there is an non -impressive rating for 51% approval Rotten tomatoes. Although she had the same title as Disney's animated film "Alice in Wonderland" in 1951, it was more than a sequel than a remake, after Alice (Mia Vasikovsa) again in the country of miracles, after it has already become an adult. There, she discovered that the fantasy kingdom was divided by war and violence, which led her to donate an armor suit and take a sword to do things properly.

Disney has previously reworked some of her animated films ("The Jungle Book" in 1994, "101 Dalmatians" in 1996), but Alice embarked on a new trend for the studio. During the 15-year-olds, Disney reviews its own properties with pointed aggression, reinforcing theaters with a huge restart of nostalgia-bait. Some of the films in this trend served as a review of famous characters ("Maleficent", "Cruella"), while others were completely remake that used so far as using the same songs as their predecessors ("The Jungle Book", "Beauty and the Beast", "The Little Siren", "The Lion King", "Aladdine,", "Aladdy,", "Aladdy,", "Aladdy,", "The Little Siren", "The Lion King", "The L. "Snow Bell"). These films, for the most part, were wildly successful, even if most hit the audience as creative bankruptcy.

More importantly, all of these Disney remake took elements, designs of characters and parcels of the animated features that inspired them, ensuring that Disney, the company, still had absolute mastery over these stories. Indeed, the mouse house insists on controlling the "standard" version of certain fairy tales, even those coming from folklore or literature. The rhymers repeat the cognitive "property" of the studio.

In terms of quality, the remuneration is at best mixed. That, he said, rotten tomatoes can at least point us to films that were the warmest of critics.

As for this writing, Jonon Favareu's film in 2016 "The Jungle Book" is the best -viewed live remake of Disney live, with a 94%approval rating. The film is, of course, but one of the many adaptations of the adventurous novel by Randard Kipling of 1894 by the same name. But really, it's a remake of Wolfgang Rentman's animated adaptation that Disney released in 1967. There are several same songs (by the Sherman brothers), and Favre's visuals were clearly designed to evoke that film. In a coup for special effects, most of the "Jungle Book" is animated, with animals that speak animals and most of the backgrounds are CGI. The only live element of live is Mogli, played by Neil Sethi. A number of celebrities have also expressed life characters, including Ben Kings as a baguette, Idris Elba as Shere Khan, Scarlett Johansson as Kaa, Christopher Walker like King Lewis and Bill Murray as Balu.

Critics praised Javre's film for his visual, and also thought he was more careful and significant than the 1967 animated film that inspired him. Anthony Lane on Yorkujorker He was one of the few slanderers, claiming that the glittering visuals were in the service of promoting technology and did not communicate a story or humanity very well.

Favreau would use a similar approach to comprehensive special effects when he renovated The Lion King since 1994 in 2019. Despite being often described as live action, the film is almost completely animated in a photorealistic way (Save, literally, one live shot) and also used the same songs as its predecessor. The result was less well accepted, however, because the photorealistic lions were defective; They looked Too much like real animals. Moreover, "The Lion King" is one of the worst films in the Disney-Remak trend, sporting a 52% approval of rotten tomatoes. However, it was an even bigger hit than Alice in Wonderland, making $ 1.66 billion in box office. A prerequisite, titled "Mufasa: King Leo", was published in 2024.

The second highest rating for Disney's Disney Remake approval was given to the 2016 version of Pete Dragon, directed by David Lower and has an 88% rating based on 244 views. It also stands out from the other studio remake, because Pete Dragon is incredibly different from its predecessor, taking a more spiritual, real approach to the material. Next after that is Kenneth Branag's "Cinderella" reduses in 2015, "Cinderella", who has an 84% approval rating and actually bothers to use his story in interesting ways. Namely, the wicked stepmother (Kate Blanchett) got a cute backstew that made her feel a little tragic (but not so cute that she was not a villain).

Sitting in the fourth place on the list is the live adaptation with Steven Somers' 1994 action on the "Jungle Book", which has an 80%approval rating. Namely, however, that film did not listen back to Disney's animated film in 1967; It was just a new interpretation of Kipling's original story. This leads us to "Kruella", the fifth highest ranked remake of Disney and a study of self-best-on-the-best directed by Craig Guilleryt. The 2021 film was based on an unusual idea by striving to create complex and mythical heavy backstation for Kruella de Vill (Emma Stone), a woman who just wanted to skin a bunch of Dalmatian puppies to make a fur coat in "One hundred and one Dalmatians".

Skipping forward at the bottom of the list, we have "Pinocchio" by Robert Knatis, who spilled tons of money into live transformation and CGI on Disney's animated film in 1940, but still felt meaningless and visually busy, earning 27%. Even lower than "One hundred and one Dalmatians" in 1996, restarting "101 Dalmatians," Live Film with Action starring Brilliant Glenn Clos like Cruella de Vill.