Of course, there are many variable factors to include here. For example, rotten tomatoes did not officially start by 2000 and did not become an excellent cultural force by about 2003 or 2004. The web site has more recent reviews than the older, which will be approved for approval. "Strange New Worlds", for example, has 87 views, while "Star Trek: The Animated Series" (ranked third, with a 94%approval) there are only 18. Also, many of the recent emission approval are based only on views of their first episodes and not a full litigation. Shows in the 1990s were rated as a whole, while "strange new worlds" were rated perhaps five episodes.

"Star Trek: Next Generation" was the fourth on the RT list with a 91%approval rating, while Deep Space Nine almost tied "lower decks" with 91%approval, with only less reviews.

Iousbopitous, less attractive Nu-Trek shows like "Star Trek: Discovery" and "Star Trek: Picard" still received a very positive response, at least at the beginning. "Picard" has an 89%approval rating, bringing it to #7, while "Disco", the first Nu-Treck series, is in the 8th with 84. These plays are fiercely disputed and /Movie has spent the record why they don't work very well. Coming behind them, pretty confusing was the original 1966 Star Trek series, boasting only 80% of approval. However, it is based on 42 views, some of them vintage.

At the bottom of the list is "Star Trek: Voyager" (76%) of #10, and finally, on #11, "Star Trek: Enterprise" (56%).

Nu-third shows can boast about this: on average, they have 91.8%approval. Fans of the two original shows can take comfort in the knowledge that their average is 87%, but Track fans of the 90s will be injured to learn that their four shows an average of up to 78.75%.