Disney has been producing live remake for some of their favorite animated films for a long time, but this practice has especially dominated the 2010 studio's ambitions, when Alice in Wonderland has earned over $ 1 billion. Since then, we have had films with different quality of hit theaters, with some highlights, including "Cinderella" and "The Jungle Book", both showing their part of the Chinese merit. But for the most part, films such as "Beauty and Asters", "Aladdin" and "Lion King" may have been a $ 1 billion hits, but failed to add something worthwhile to these beloved stories. Not to mention, returns are reduced by recent releases, such as Rob Marshall's "Little Mirins" and Mark Web's "Snow White", which fail to make the waves financial, financial, Although the accommodated boxing of the "lilo and stitch" cancer can breathe life back in practice for better or worse.

Universal is the latest studio that has jumped on the trend of a live remake, "how to train your dragon" is the first adaptation of the DreamWorks Animation animation film. The fingers have passed that Disney is not using this as an inspiration for live live adaptations Pixar, but all bets are excluded at this time. While reviews tend to be more positive for the first adaptation of live action to DreamWorks (You can read the movie review here. As mentioned in the paragraph above, some live remake with action justify their existence, but they are too much more than lazy cash abductions. However, there is an underestimated live remake with action that Disney produced almost a decade ago that deserves a larger audience and is the one who may appeal to the audience collecting in cinemas to experience the first flight of the hack and without teeth together: "Pete's Dragon".

Released at the end of the blockbuster in the summer of 2016, Disney's remake of Pete Dragon is highlighted as one of the more valuable additions to the studio. For beginners, although followed by the trend of producing multiple remakes based on existing intellectual properties, this film, directed by David Lower, is based on the 1977 film directed by Don Shafi, which was a live hybrid film/animated film. To be fair, the original "Pete Dragon" was not a huge hit, as well as many other animated films that Disney continues to grab a new remake every year, so the 21st century remake is not too bizarre. But out of that, it is based on an old IP, the remake of the Lower has several elements that make it emphasize.

While the original film "Pete Dragon" was a musical, the remake for 2016 is not. Director David Lower Co-wrote the script with Toby Halbrux and decided to say more earthy family drama. Well, there is still the element of adventurous fantasies, as it has a dragon, but the family dynamics are a front and center in the remake. One of the ways in which the remake honored the original is that it began in 1977, the same year in which the original film was released, before spraying forward in 1983, where the story gathered. The remake also remains true to the title of the original film: Pete and his Dragon, Eliot. Oces Fegley plays Pete in the remake, and his relationship with Eliot is gently trapped, many of which are thanks to the earthy human perspective that Lower carries the film, as well as the beautiful work of VETA Digital in the passing of Eliot's life.

Rounding out the cast of Rimer Pete Dragon are Brice Dallas Howard, Wes Bentley, Carl Urban, Oona Lawrence and Robert Redford. Lower brings convincing performances from his entire team, and their material is elevated thanks to the seriousness and heat of the screen throughout the period. The film also conquered viewers with its background in the northwest of the Pacific, paired with its fantastic elements, causing Amblin's adventurous films, such as "Extra-Copy" and "Guonances".

If you had to check the movie circles on the Internet, the consensus seems to be that most kinefiles are really tired of the live remuneration of animated films. Since Disney has dominated this practice for the last 15 years, the question was just in time before other study as a universal to investigate their catalog, and now, "how to train your dragon" is growing in cinemas. The film, directed by the co-director of the original film Dean Unbloyis, looks like a faithful adaptation, almost on a mistake. Given the inherent emotional power of the original film, it is difficult not to feel affected by the spectacle, but much of those feelings have already been exposed to the original animated film, considering the whole exercise unnecessary.

The live sequel with action "How to train your dragon" is currently scheduled for a theater edition. It is not known whether this sequel will be a remake of 2014 "How to Train Your Dragon 2", but also DreamWorks and Disney should find some inspiration from the "Pete Dragon" remake of a special element: making these new adaptations fresh and relevant to their own merits. Of course, "Lilo and Stitch" are making gangbasters, but after all, these live remakes fail to hold a candle compared to their superior original animated counterparts.

Following the model that David Lounon's "Pete Dragon" brought to the cinema should serve as the right kind of inspiration for new adaptations. In fact, studios need to explore some of their lesser known properties to adapt to modern audiences, since most are already familiar with many of the IPS being reproduced. The Pete -Black in 1977 never stands out in the Disney catalog in the same way that they have its numerous films in the Renaissance era with a certain generation, so the remake made both a creative and financial feeling, especially since the 2016 adaptation earned $ 143.7 million with a budget of $ 65 million.

The 2016 interview can be read /film with director "Pete Dragon" David Lower here. Meanwhile, both the remake and Fascinatingly strange and surprising means a 1977 film is available to be transmitted to Disney+.