Here are large spoilers for "28 years later".

There is one key information you need to know before watching "28 years later": it's not a full story. Okay, for sure, the film has its own narrative bow, but this is intended to be the first of a whole new trilogy of films. The second, titled "28 Years Later: Bone Temple", is already shot and is due to come out next year. But if you didn't know that, you might see the end of "28 years later" and be extremely confused. I am almost positive, some members of my printing audience were unaware of this information because I heard that many of them argue and express confusion about the big climate of the film.

This is quite frustrating in general, because as I said in my review, "28 years later" is pretty damn. In fact, until the end works and works extremely well. And then, director Dani Boyle and the writer Alex Garland impose themselves on an extremely awkward last minute in order to set up the next film. The tone of this scene does not fit the rest of the film at all and feels like a coincidence we started watching a completely different movie.

In short, it is not working, and it is bound to confuse some people.

To be fair, the end of "28 years later" is not entirely from the left field. The seed for the final (and what follows) are planted in a very disturbing prologue of the film. This moment jumps at the beginning of the outbreak of the Rage virus we saw in the first film. We see a group of kids somewhere in the Scottish Highlands watching TV on TV in the house.

Suddenly, the chaos broke out as infected people burst. The parents of the children are quickly sent, as are the children themselves. But one of them, a boy named Jimi, escaped. He runs to the nearby church where he meets his father, priest. Instead of being afraid of the infected, this man of God sees the event as a world, a divine moment. He gives the young Jimi Cross and then allows the horde of infected spirits to attack him. Mymi looks at horror as his father changes to a monster. It's scary things! And then the film jumps forward ... 28 years later.

After this introduction, "28 years later" is inserted into completely different characters. Our main focus is Spike (Alfie Williams), a 12-year-old living on a secluded island with his father Jameimi (Aaron Taylor-Nsonson) and his mother Isla (Ododi Komer). The UK is effectively quarantined by the rest of the world, capturing the hordes of infected people (and those who are not infected) inside, and Spike and his family live in peace, hidden by the mainland and his infected spirits.

During the film, we get a reminder of Jimi through some graffiti thrown out on the wall and his name engraved in the chest of an infected person (enough confusing, the image of Silian Murphy in the first film, "28 days later", is Also Called Jimim, but these are not intended to be the same person). The implication is that Jimi is there, somewhere.

Isla is suffering from a mysterious illness, and Spike has decided to take her on a dangerous journey through the infected land to find a doctor (Ralph Fien) to help treat her. Along the way, Spike and Isla rescue a baby born from an infected woman (the baby appears uninfected). In the end, they find the doctor, who unfortunately tells them that Isla has cancer and she will die soon - and she, peacefully.

After Isla's death, Spike releases the baby back to his island community, but decides to go out on the ground and investigate. Boyle and Garland should They finished the movie here. Instead, there is a really awkward scene where Spike has been rescued by a horde of infected by the Ghoofballs gang wearing light colored tracksuits (the colors of their clothing reflect the colors of the teletus). This group makes a bunch of entrance links and parks and kills the group infected, and then the gang leader (Played by "sinners" vampire Jackec O'Connell) Presented with Spike: His name is Jimi! You know, how the child at the beginning of the film! Rolls loans.

O'Connell is clearly having fun in his short scene, but his character feels So Strange - and his strange clothing, which seems to be a straight referral to the infamous person on English TV, Jimi Savile, holds as a sick thumb. Will this make sense in the next movie? Probably. But here, it feels completely out of place and hurts otherwise a strong movie. It is another example of modern movies that do not understand they can say One A complete story without setting up a whole franchise. I am interested in seeing where the story goes from here (it seems clear that although Jimi and his gang have helped Spike, he is Probably Bad news), but "28 years later" shouldn't have ended like this.