Jay-Zhis supposed son, Rymir Satterthwaitehas publicly voiced his support for the rapper's rape accusation as legal proceedings against the music mogul continue.

In a statement, the 31-year-old gave what he said was a "helping hand" to Jane Doe, who accused his alleged father and Sean "Diddy" Combs that he raped her at a party when she was 13 years old.

Rymir Satterthwaite previously claimed his family faced years of intimidation and stress stemming from their paternity case against Jay-Z.

I'm talking to The US Sun, Satterthwaite has once again addressed the Jay-Z rape case, this time offering his support to the plaintiff while accusing the rapper of harassment.

"You know, we stand behind anyone who's being bullied," Satterthwaite told the outlet. "You know, we're a helping hand, we'll always help whatever she needs from us or our team, we're here for her."

The 31-year-old told Jane Doe to stay strong in her legal battle against Jay-Z, just like him, even if she faces setbacks.

"We've been going through years of arguing with lawyers and these judges and big celebrity cases, so I can tell you it's been an argument, but don't give up," Satterthwaite continued.

"You don't always win the fight, but you always get up and try again, and you know it's not the end of the world."

Satterthwaite, together with his godfather, Dr. Lillie Coley, previously spoke about the alleged plot to pressure him to drop the case, including incidents of intimidation and the fact that he never had a trial for his claims.

As for the alleged intimidation incidents, Satterthwaite claimed he experienced being followed, his car shot at and people driving onto his front lawn at 4 a.m., as previously stated in a recent complaint against the rapper.

While he did not directly blame Jay-Z or his team for the incidents, he stated that the "pop-ups" at his house and "random shootings" only started after his case with the rapper began.

The 31-year-old's godmother then highlighted their claim that Jay-Z conspired with the court system to deny them their "constitutional rights" and prevent them from presenting their case in court.

"(We) never had a trial, never had a hearing, never had a day in court. Everything was thrown out, pushed out and hushed up," Coley said. "And that's what we're fighting for, because it's more about constitutional rights.

In a previous interview, Coley discussed how Jay-Z's ongoing rape lawsuit could mark a "day of reckoning" for the rapper's career and the music industry as a whole.

"And that's why you have to be careful how you treat people and what you do because I believe you will reap what you sow," Coley said The US Sun.

Coley also believed the latest allegations could "spill over" to their own case because it "shows a larger narrative, a larger scope of what's going on and it goes deep and wide."

However, she did not provide any further clarification on how she believed this would play out or whether she had been contacted by the rape accused's legal team.

In the same interview, Satterthwaite said he was not motivated by fame or money to file paternity claims against Jay-Z.

"I'm really not trying to chase you, not to get fame or money. I don't want anything from you. I've always said that," the alleged son told the magazine.

Satterthwaite went on to express his anger at how the case had dragged on all these years.

"You guys went and pulled this off. You didn't give us a fair trial for years and years," he said.

He also pointed out that this case caused him and his family "damage" and "stress", stressing that they were only looking for the "truth" and were not trying to hurt anyone.

In the submission he came up with Fox News DigitalJay-Z's lawyer, Alex Spiro, expressed fears that the rapper's accuser could destroy evidence in their case after the alleged victim admitted she was wrong in her allegations.

As part of the filing, the attorney urged the court to compel the anonymous plaintiff and her attorney, Tony Buzby, to "preserve all evidence relevant to this case."

Jay-Z's lawyer also poked holes in the alleged victim's case, citing mistakes she made in her statements during the interview.

This includes Jane Doe's claim that the assault took place at a private residence, which, according to Jay-Z's lawyer, does not exist.

"The time frame, location and occurrence of the events alleged in Plaintiff's complaint are precluded by this admission," Jay-Z's attorney also wrote in the documents. "Taken together, the factual inconsistencies, timeline impossibilities, and lack of corroborating evidence render the prosecutor's allegations . . . wholly unreliable."