Blake Lively Maybe celebrating a great victory of the courtroom, but the legal expert calls for caution.

While the judge was rejected Justin Baldoni 'With massive prices, the legal battle is all but more.

With potential amendments dealing with trial by 2026. year, the lawyer warns that this Hollywood Showdown is still warming, and victory could be transient.

In the dramatic step 9. June, the Federal Judge rejected Justin Baldonija of $ 400 million against Blake lively, her husband Ryan Reynolds and her publicist Leslie Sloane.

The judge also kicked out Baldonian claims for a slander of $ 250 million New York Times.

However, two key receivables, a violation of the implied alliance and tortured interference, may be amended until 23. June.

Lively's legal team called the ruling "overall victory and complete manual", and the actress itself took on Instagram, declaring a lawsuit against her "defeated" won to the women's rights.

Still in Chat with People Magazine, Lawyer Gregory Doll, which was not involved, was warned, "the decision is undoubtedly impact in Balardony. But the case is far from him. One thing I learned many times as a parigeter not too early to celebrate."

Although the lively side may seem to keep the upper arm, the doll says that a lot can change between now and trial in March 2026. years.

"It is still much left in the proceedings of court courts, including amendments to the charging," he said People. "As all litigations know, sometimes you win everything at trial just to see your reverse on the appeal."

The doll also noted that most civilian cases were addressed before reaching the trial, the fate that still predicts.

"Does that affect the lively lever in the negotiations on the settlement? Yes," he said. "Will the Baldons fight in the fight, including amendment to their appeals to try to do nausea and implied packages to allies? Yes."

One tough that Baldoni can revise lively and reynolds, and customers of WME, pressing the agency to throw Baldoni, the WME's nagged.

Second refers to the Baldonian claim that he did not act lively in good faith under their ", the contract is completed."

As for defamation lawsuits against New York TimesThe doll believes that it is never expected to succeed. "It's a suit was more pr moved to pull out his story to the public," he said.

Baldonije's lawyer, Bryan Freedman, returned back to Live's circle Victory Lap. "The lively and its representation predictable Declaration of victory is false," said in Statement on 10. June.

He continued, "lively allegations today are neither the trunks, and with facts on our side we marching forward with the same confidence that we had when the lady was initiated and merged with his upcoming sediment, which I will take over."

Once Baldoni assigns their amendments, probably a lively team will handle another rejection request.

However, the final verdict cannot be reached until the hearing conclude in 2026. years or the parties settle behind closed doors.

Judge Lewis Liman fired Justin Baldonia of $ 400 million against lively, Reynolds and New York TimesThe judgment that its statements are protected by the legal privilege.

"The parties on the road are not alleged to be alive for accountability for any statements except the statements in its CRD's appeal, which are privileged," he said Explosion.

The judge added that there is no evidence of Reynolds, Leslie Sloane Publicist or Time acted with the level of defamication.

He also noted: "Times did not have an obvious motive to favor the living version of the event."

The appeal was fully discharged.