There will always be an appetite for Movies for World War II. It is a classic story of good versus evil, which is obviously reductive than true history, but when did Hollywood ever care about it? World War I, on the other hand, does not give light narratives. That is, simply to say, war for nothing. The Great Powers had an arsenal of glossy new toys since the early 20th century, and the assassination of Aardeke Franz Ferdinand lighted an international tension powder and released the weapons of mass destruction.
There are no good guys and bad guys in World War I, with soldiers and citizens also caught in the middle of a minor altercation between their nationalist leaders. Then it's not surprising to have Fewer films from World War I. Few we have received in the last few years, like "All Silent on the Western Front" And "1917" They are short of the heroes and are closer to a horror movie than your typical military film.
One of the best records in the first World War film catalog is Stanley Kubrick's film "Paths of Glory" of 1957. The picture is followed by Kirk Douglas Colonel Dax, who serves in the French army, as he is tasked with leading his people on a suicide mission, his bosses know he is destined to fail. He follows his order, believing in the chain of command, but in the chaos of the battle, his people are understandably returning from a certain death. Instead of accepting the blame for failure, the general responsible for the operation accuses the male coward and orders three men, randomly selected as representatives of the entire composition, to be judicial and executed.
All of this was based on a true story, but Kubrick's strictly realized vision proved to be too realistic for some of the forces that are, and the "paths of fame" found banned in several countries.
Claims to be "anti -war" led to bans on "trails of glory"
By the time the loans are rolling on the "trails of glory", the defendants are executed, and the bosses actually responsible for failure receive nothing more than a slap on the wrist. This dark, unfortunate finish of left audience has been surprised and received critical recognition after the release, but has not helped the film find fans in power halls.
It was considered a provocative anti -war film by governments around the world, "Trails of Glory" that did not surprise the greatest controversy in France. Defenders both within the French army denied the screening of the film of French generals, and the French government put pressure on the European distributor of the film not to release the film. It would not be scripted in France until 1975, delaying 18 years.
German and Swiss governments followed France's leadership and postponed the film, with Germany postponing it for two years to try Curry favorite with FranceWhile the Swiss government banned the film by 1970. The military of the United States too banned the film through all its military bases, Both at home and abroad, perhaps to prevent their troops from questioning their leader's decisions. The fascist dictatorship of Spain's General Francisco Franco introduced the longest ban on the film, preventing the screening of "Glory Paths" in Spain until 1986, 19 years later and 11 years after Franco's death.
Despite their best efforts, "trails of fame" lives, inspired by countless directors and One of the best TV -emissions of all time. And almost 20 years after their wrong executions, men who inspired the film were posthumously free of the French government. It may be too little, too late, but it is certainly the least they could do to respect their sacrifice.
Source link