Calling Remeans live on acting on the animated Disney classics "Live-action" falls under the same discourse umbrella Jameseims Cameron's "Avatar" filmsWhere the lack of difference between the animated live cinema, hybrid and full time, for the audience to know just how much CGI expects. Regarding the remake of the "lion king" And the foretelling of the film, "Mufasa", We're talking about essential 100%, pure photorealistic CGI animation.

Ad

On the other hand, there is something like "Snow White" or "Beauty and Astver", a film in which human actors communicate with other people, as well as the CGI characters, not to mention the combination of CGI material sets and scenery. The latest title to get live treatment with action is "Lilo and Stitch", re -examining the beloved animated story for 2002 for a misunderstood girl in Hawaii, who hangs out with a dangerous foreigner, thinking she is just an unusual dog.

Stitch is one of Disney's biggest original creations, a character who is immediately worshiped for being responsible for the trade empire. He crosses the threshold in what I want to call "Walmart Pajami Zone", when a character becomes so recognizable that Walmart will follow the image for the character to sell pajamas pants (see also: Cookie Monster, Tweety Bird and the bat). This is to say, Disney could have turned the new Lilo & Stitch in just an hour and a half of the little man ran on the CGI screen, and people would still turn out to driving cinemas. Fortunately one of the many things The remake "Lilo and Stitch" becomes right is that it finds the perfect balance between the animated elements of CGI in the world live, making it easier to immerse yourself in the story than ever before.

Ad

The original "lilo and stitch" is One of the best movies set to Hawaii Sometimes made, using stunning watercolor techniques for film backgrounds. In a live renaming of action, Disney similarly shows the Hawaiian setting in all its glory. After the cold spaceship open, the two films open under water as a fish school swim, and the way the remake transports viewers through the unforgettable opening of the animated film, but with real fish and real people who swim, is pure Disney magic. When Nani (Sydney Elisebet Agudong), Lilo (Maya Kealoha) and Stitch (Chris Sanders) go out to surf in the "Hawaiian roller coaster" melody, it is doubled to see an impressive view Real People destroy waves. Even when digital elements are in play (there are aliens and loud shouting portals), it is easier to suspend disbelief because it has a sufficiently tangible, practical reality to take the story.

Ad

Looking at "Lilo & Stitch" purely from a hybrid CGI/Live-action perspective, this film finds the sweet spot to justify its existence in the first place. Obviously, Disney can do what he wants with his IP and will continue to do so no matter what the writer like me has to say about it, but if he continues to make these live adaptations (enhanced by CGI animation), stories like Lilo and Stitch have proved to be the best. When the animated film already exists, having something completely CGI like "The Lion King" feels superfluous. There is also something almost unusual about the "beauty and aster" or "Snow White" thanks to the abundance of CGI that exceeds a small number of human elements. Finding the balance is crucial and this is what unites all the best of these renaming.

Ad

The reason Disney films are constantly influential and resonated with the audience is because they successfully enter relative, human experiences. Moviegoers are ready to surrender to the story-whether it is told in live action or animation-everything until there is a break in world building. For example it was Arraring To switch from human actors to "Snow White" in the magical creatures of the man CGI in place of the seven dwarfs. It completely broke the immersion and therefore makes it difficult to invest in the story. In a situation like "Cinderella" in 2015, spontaneous additions to magical transformations and characters retained the audience written because it was set against the background of detailed sets, elaborate costumes and tangible props. There is an animal feeling and texture in the environment that cannot always replicate CGI. "Pete Dragon" is another movie that has found the perfect balance, with human expressions and material settings that help the audience perceive the aspects of CGI as a real job.

Ad

Complete CGI characters or environments can sometimes appear flat or noticeable artificial, which creates a barrier between audiences and the story, but that is not to say that there are no exceptions that prove the rule. "The Jungle Book" is largely considered one of the best live remuneration, although human actor Neil Seti shows Mogli in a set almost exclusively built by CGI and opposite CGI animals with glorious casting. And I would argue in this case, the reason that works is because we essentially see a fully animated film with the addition of a man. We buy in a fully animated world, but not distant from the presence of Mogli because our brains accept that he is One something that looks different. It is much more difficult for the brain to determine what is real and what is not when it changes.

Ad

Lilo and Stitch works because the audience knows "everything related to foreigners will look like CGI" and make sense of the scheme. If Disney continues this trip, it should continue to respect the balance.

Lilo and Stitch is now playing in cinemas.