Steven Spielberg is reckless one of the greatest directors of all time, but to be human (as far as we know), he is sinful. He made a thorough fake film ("Indiana Onesons and the Kingdom of Crystal Skull"), strange inert ("BFG") and must respond to The bizarre debacle on the back that is "hook".
Ad
These wrong fires are rare for director like Spielberg, who does not have to move forward on a project until it is good and ready. He is known for shooting fast and confident, intuitively putting the camera exactly where it should be (in the opportunities when it does not show the story, such as "Extra-Terrist" and "Schindler's list") and the delivered film that is narratively concise and thematically rich. The only thing better than watching Steven Spielberg's film is the first time to know that it will open up in new and surprising ways of subsequent reviews. Today no director works that can be found at the top of Spielberg as a visual storyteller (though they are rooted for The goat, Brian de Palmato make sure to make another movie).
Ad
Every time a new movie Steven Spielberg is released, he immediately becomes one of my most anticipated films from any year. The only exception was the day I found out that he was directing the adaptation of Ernie Clin's novel "Ready Player One". Aggressive Nostalgia Pastish With video games in Generation X, the wedge book was a literary cotton candy. Was a purely overload with one page sugar. If you managed to power through the line of pop cultural references to the conclusion of the conclusion (seriously, it is said as a "American psycho" written by a weak on Cheetos, who is never busy in his shirt), you probably didn't think, "I really wanted the guy who directed his" jaw ",
However, Spielberg saw something here, and, seven years after his theater edition, Max subscribers eat him up.
Ready player one is a fascinating subversion of source material
According to Flixpatrol"Ready Player One" is currently the fourth most watched Max movie that makes sense of a scattered level of view because you can play this film in the background and see something visually stimulated every time you ask. But is this film good?
Ad
"Ready Player One" tells the story of Wade Watts, a stuck child who, while escaping the amazement of post-apocalyptic Columbos, Ohio (about 2045) with joining virtual reality games, is in the race to locate this The book had an interesting idea of the mind, but Spielberg, the longtime gamer himself (dates back to the Pong era), locked in something subversive in terms of an inherent empty search for a virtual environment. Spielberg has always been a dreamer, but he made these fantasy flights by putting boots on the ground and making them in partial fashion with many crew members running and in advance. Escapism is hard work.
Ad
Again, I think Ready Player One is most digested in random pieces of people who have already seen the film. I suspect they are dealing with metaphor and deeper meaning in this stream. But if you can overcome your aversion to the source material and its nasty surface, Spielberg's film is not a warm, nostalgic embrace, nor is it pro-corporate. It's much darker, far more cynical film than people think (Although /film Chris Evangelist begs to distinguish).
Source link