Imagine comedy "Borat! 2006 Cultural Learning" Make Kazakhstan's glorious nation "is easy to understand on its surface. The title character (Sacha Baron Cohen) is a Kazakh journalist who knows little about the United States, and he travels to American culture. Living outside the right edge. Bush, a time when the American was engaged in more wars abroad, and directors clearly wanted to expose how ignorant Americans were for other nations.
Ad
Perhaps the biggest joke of the film is that its display of Kazakhstan is fully invented. Kazakhstan is a real country, of course, a significant mountain nation along the southern border of Russia. But director Larry Charles and Cohen portray Kazakhstan as a sexist, oppressive country that regularly deals with incest and public anti -Semitism. Borat also claims that the national drink in Kazakhstan is a horse urine and that it is a national dish is horse meat. This is very far from what the real nation is experiencing.
Certainly, the Kazakhstan government Initially hated "fighting" for all its claimsFeeling that the film will mislead the ignorant Americans about the true culture of their country. They eventually came around, however, Using the film as a means of publicity of tourism. Borat is funny! Now come to see it Real Kazakhstan! Until 2016, everything was digacetic.
Ad
However, before the eventual acceptance of the film, the Kazakh director named Erkin Rakishev prepared a slightly more acidic response. Rakishev is said to have written and directed Satire at Borat in 2011, called "My Brother, Borat" that overturned the scenario of Cohen and Charles. Unfortunately, it was never announced.
Kazakhstani director planned to make a Borat response movie called my brother, Borat
As early as 2010, Rakishev talked to the BBC For his planned film, feeling too many people in America and England took "fighting" at nominal value. He said: "Every Kazakh that goes west feels uncomfortable to say where it is. This is because people in the West are linking the country to Borat's film." And this is a fair charge. The point of Charles and Cohen's film is that Americans are ignorant for other countries and proved to be true. Unfortunately, Cohen and Charles have chosen a real country to fight, and they don't care about inventing an offensive new stereotype on the road. Rakishev continued to say:
Ad
"When (Cohen) Made His Film, It Offended Our Nation. Barbarians and wild people. Believe it's true. ”
As such, "my brother, fighting" was put in production and at least partially shot. The premise was supposed to be an inversion of Borat, as an American journalist (named Johnon) would travel to Kazakhstan, just to find that it was an overly advanced utopia. Johnon will spend most of his time with Borat's brother, a character named (Roman Kikalov), who was briefly mentioned in Charles' film, so Rakishev ran with him.
Ad
My brother, fight, like the original, was supposed to be a little offensive
Rakishev noted in an interview with the BBC that he had already filmed several scenes, and they were deliberately shocking and offensive, much about Cohen and Charles' film. There was supposed to have a sexual assault film with a donkey and another scene in which an old Divjac woman beat the two main sticks with a stick. That, he said, Rakishev wanted to know that he did not "go to such a low level of toilet humor" as the original. From the descriptions, "My Brother, Borat" would not have been semi-documentary as the original but fully script film.
Ad
Rakishev said he made more films in Kazakhstan that year only, though they were not published on the international market. We can recall the recognized film "Tulpan", as it was delivered to the Academy Awards, in mind for the best international post, but it was published in 2008. Kazakh films are not widespread, unfortunately.
Just like unfortunately, it seems that "my brother, fighting" has completely disappeared after his mention of the BBC. Rakishev has never come out with a finished film, and nothing seems to have been shown anywhere in the world. It can be theorized that Fox of the 20th century sued him for a violation of copyright, although it is just as likely that Rakishev could not receive funds to complete the film. Every hope that Rakishev had to rebuke Cohen and Charles never came true. And, as mentioned, Kazakhstan eventually came to accept "fight" as a means to make the world look in their direction, even if it was the worst possible representation for their country.
Ad
In 2020, Cohen returned for "Subsequent Moviefilm: Delivery of a huge bribery to the US regime to make a once -glorious nation of Kazakhstan." Just Rudy Ululiani and his supporters He seemed to be upset by that.
Source link