Justin Baldoni He filed new legal documents seeking from the court to throw Blake LivelyThe request of the publicist to dismiss from his disputed legal battle.

Baldoni stated that a lively journalist, Leslie SloaneHe made him "Scapegoat" and "played an active and constituting role in the conspiracy to cause harm" to him.

It comes like a white and her husband, Ryan Reynolds, looking for a protective order for their conversations with other famous personalities over fears that the Justin Baldonic camp can leave them.

Baldoni claims that a lively journalist, Sloane, should not be removed from his controversial lawsuit as she made him a "victim" for "trouble".

Through his lawyer, Sigrid McCawley, Sloane sent legal documents for her and her firm, the view of the PR, to be rejected from Baldoni and his Production company Wayfarer Studios, her husband Ryan Reynolds, and alone.

However, according to Daily mail"He ended with the actor's legal paperwork for the competition of the request, claiming that Sloane and its firm" played an active and integral role in the conspiracy, its production company and its PR team Melissa Nathan and Jennifer Abel.

Baldoni said in the opposition memorandum that the layer "conspired" by lively, Reynolds and New York Times to "do the victims of the journey on the way to live trouble."

States that everything is "in a desperate effort to save a lively reputation and escape the wrath."

Baldoni claimed Sloane and her PR company "Radio months to emit bread crumbs and hints of ominous accusations to the public, and secretly feeding untruths to any reporter to listen."

Elsewhere in the submitted, Baldoni dragged New York Times Reporter written by an article that described in detail the alive sexual harassment and appeal the campaign of the smear.

The actor has then filed a $ 250 million lawsuit against the publication, claiming that she gave them information to tarnate his picture.

"As a direct result of (their) actions, Baldoni claimed that he and those of his team" damaged outside the measure "," the document read. "Their reputations were destroyed, their companies lie in the tattoos, and their own film was taken out of them."

Meanwhile, the judge on Tuesday suggested that he could dismiss New York Times as accused in case.

The American District Judge Lewis Liman said that 20. February 28. February would say from the case that offered "significant reasons for the cancellation" and "strong that he shows his rejection."

In the middle of their legal battle with a canopy, actress "gossip girlfriend" and her husband is looking for a protective order to keep their conversations with private private.

At the hearing in the Federal Court, Menhattan said the pair would like to set a protective warrant for the "high profile" people about the vibrant time, "As we are afraid of us," how they are afraid to encourage them in the press.

In court, the lawyer explained that such texts would have a high "PR value" whether they are relevant to the fact of the case.

"There is a significant chance of incorrigible damage if marginal conversations with high individuals without relevance in case they fall into the wrong hands," said the levy, on New York Post.

"There are 100 million reasons for these parties to study information because the PR value is higher than complying with the court's order," the lawyer added.

Although no name in their request is mentioned to keep their conversations, the Hollywood couple has close connections to the stars on the list like Taylor Swift, Hugh Jackman, Emily Blunt, John Krasinski and Model Gigi Hadid.

Swift is seemingly indented in the cottage as Baldoni cited to vigorously called Khalees from the "Game of Threme" and invited his wife and "empty space" Hitmaker as "my dragons."

Global Popstar would state that he greeted to provide testimony, but legal experts think that her continuous silence "speaks the Saint."

The PR expert Adrienne Uthe spoke of the probability of a quick retreat in Baldonia and a lively legal Fed.

"Taylor publicly distanced himself from this - and I have why. He probably hopes to remain completely from the mess," he said in Fox News. "But that's not a reality. I like it or not, people want to hear her testimony. Because nothing good comes - and honestly, who would like to be in her position? But her silence also speaks her silence."

"It seems to be aligned with Hollywood powered players - and it encourages a picture of" good girls, "many her fans were held," they added, "he added.

"People remain strategically silent for a number of reasons, and some stars just want to avoid the press. But for someone as a medium-pamy as Taylor Swift from this? And honestly, we all want to hear her side," the finger added.