Michael JordanIts racing team, 23xi racing, has been sued for planning to plan for the desired treatment by Nascar.

In the case filed on Wednesday, March 4 and received AthleticJordan's team and its long -term business partner, Curtain pollHas been accused of acting like "an illegal cartel".

The racing team Front Row Motors has been named as part of the alleged plan in the case.

Nascar has claimed that the two parties have agreed to a project to press Nascar to take their collective terms, to engage in media promoting, interfere with Nascar's broadcasting negotiation discussions, threatens the boycott of the Nascar event, and a group boycott of the Nascal team involves boycott.

The case has been alleged that the driving force behind this effort was.

Pollock alleged that "all parties in the discussion, coordinating their behavior and threatening parties that left the conspiracy and interfere with and Nascar's media rights contracts negatively influence Nascar's efforts to renew."

The filing was a case filed in October 2024 -a countersut of the moccadmar Bob JenkinsWho owns the front row motorports. In addition to his connection to the racing world, Jenkins is deeply connected to Yom! The restaurant brand is the family and hundreds of KFCs, Taco Bell, Long John Silvers and A&W positions.

Jenkins' case Naskar and CEO of the company accused of the company, Jim FranceUsing "Premier Stock Car Racing teams to enrich yourself" "anticipative and exclusionary practices".

The legal war is centered on all Nascar's Charter System in which AthleticIs "the sport of franchisees that assure the holder of certain financial guarantee holders of a certificate, along with an opening position in all 36 ranks of Nascar's Premier Cup series."

Toward Athletic"Nascar's court is asking the triple damage as well as the 23xI and the front row motorports to eradicate the starting starting positions in the cup series if the teams continue to litigate the case to illegate the charter contracts under the unbelievers."

In a statement Our weekly By Jeffrey23xi and front row motorports Attorney, the case is "a qualified confusion and the desperate attempt to focus from his own unlawful, exclusive activities."

The statement also said, "Naska's joint discussion agreed that they now attack." "When this joint discussion failed, they used separate discussions to impose the conditions of their Charter, which most parties decided that they had no choice but to accept them. My clients' suit was always about to convert Naskar to a more competitive and fair sport for the benefit of drivers, fans, sponsors and teams because of their love for sports. Emphasizing the claims of unbelief goes through a change in the competition, and that moment has come for Nascar. "

Cassler insisted on "nothing" to "change nothing" and reached the conclusion, "We are confident in the power of our case and are expected to present it in justice."