Arnold Schwarzenegger is a legend on the screen, but the well -known Austrian Starwar has more than a few loues on its name. The man even has a terrible zero percentage of "wounded tomatoes", though he is for a 1979 film in which he starred "a nice stranger", so he really doesn't count. What is more, according to Rotten tomatoes, Arnie starred in one of two "perfect" scientific films With the "terminator", giving the action Starwar a full 100% result to balance things.

However, between these two films is wildly uneven filmography that has everything from inexpressible classics as "Terminator 2: Day of the verdict" and "Total Reminding" to failures as failures as "Batman and Robin" - the set that became chaos largely Arnie - and a 1999 film called "End of Days", which NewsweekDavid Ansen called it "Crazy, FX Happy Thriller", which "slammed pieces of ten other films in a harmful new compound".

Unfortunately, Schwarzenegger would return to the big canvas just a year after the "end of the days" in another thriller for action, which similarly hit the pieces of other films in a ungodly united union of well -worn scientific tropes than much better films by Arnold Schwarzenegger. It would all be something ascetically for the former Mr Frieze, if that movie earns money. (No.)

The film was "Day 6", the year was 2000, and the answer was bad. Not only did Roger Spotswood's scientific-action man failed to make a profit, but the critics were not very kind to the film than Ansen needed "End of the Days".

After delivering a solid 19th installment in saga 007 with "Tomorrow Never Dies" in 1997, Canadian-British Director Roger Spotswood turned his attention to Arnold Schwarzenegger, the 6th day. But while "Tomorrow never dies" was well enough after his debut, the follow -up of Spotwood was not.

In the film set in the near future, Schwarzenegger starred as Charter Adam Gibson, who undergoes what he believes is a test of medication before work, just to return home to discover that he is illegally cloned by an insecure technology company. The company then hunted Gibson down to keep their illicit human cloning in secret. Posted on November 17, 2000, "Day 6" did $ 96 million On a $ 82m budget, which means Sony has lost a lot of loss. That loss would not be so great if Schwarzenegger did not take home a $ 25 million salary for acting, but that is what a man could charge at the time, even if he came from the "end of the days".

Unfortunately, Schwarzenegger obviously felt that the "6th day" would reveal his reputation. The 53-year-old was well aware that his days as an advantage of the Hollywood action hero were declining, and this mixing of scientific-action trophies was his way of trying to turn the tide. Unfortunately, not only was the "6th day" commercial failure, it is the derivative scientific styling of science was not a hit with critics.

Maybe we should be backed up for the site that says John Connery's best movie is "Darby O'Gil and Little People", But things don't look so great for the "6th day" Rotten tomatoes. The result of 40% of the critic and the average rating of 5 out of 10 is not the worst thing that the tomatometer has ever set aside, but not great. With righteousness, several critics thought the film was sufficiently solid scientific-output, including Roger Ebert He himself, who called it "6th day", "a well-made entertainment that contains enough ideas to qualify her as science fiction, not just as a futuristic thriller."

But the prevailing view of critics seemed to have built a kind of scientific action for pastors. In his review for Newoux TimesElvis Mitchell wrote that "almost everything in the film seems to rise from DNA to other pictures" and warned that "you can find yourself waiting for his starvet, Arnold Schwarzenegger, to wake up and discover that he is actually in a" total reminder ".

Indeed, there are so many moments in the "6th day" that remember the more impressive outings of Schwarzenegger. Even the trailer scans as a compendium of the best moments on the Austrian oak screen. Fighting the aircraft in the city center, reminiscent of the last moments of "real lies", while the whole premise revolves around the ordinary freer, caught in the machinations of a dystopian future technology company, really feels like a "total reminder". Even the "6th day" font looks a bit "terminator"-esk.

Strange enough, human bodies without fibers suspended in bags with wires connected to their spines are also reminiscent of a non-anchor-scientific film that debuted the previous year. That film was the "Matrix", with its fetal fields packed with pieces of human growth. No chances of Spotwood saw Vachovski's film and had time to raise this idea. If nothing else, it talks about the fears about the technology that existed at the end of the century. But it's another example of something that another movie has done better. Honestly, if you exhibit a science shareholder a year after debuting the "Matrix", it is better to make sure it is a hell of a movie "Day 6", unfortunately, no.