Similar to his successor, Daniel Craig, the running of Pierce Brosnan as the Jamesiames Bond was a slow descent in a parody. Perhaps it had to do with Martin Campbell, directed by the debut of the two actors such as 007, with the British director overseeing Goldenje in 1995 and Casino Royal in 2006. However, as Brosnan hanged tuxedo, he starred in what was almost universally regarded as Bond's worst movie so far: "Die another day." That is The worst movie 007 according to IMDB and similarly searched for the bottom place in /Own ranking of Bond's films.

"Die Another Day" is actually a good time if you get a complete absurdity of his ice palaces, invisible cars and central protagonists that are surgically transformed by the Korean Army generals into powerless British aristocrats. However, however, you see it, Brosnan has hardly come to a high level, and since then, his mandate as 007 has occupied an unusual space in the history of the franchise.

Some fans absolutely adore Brosnan's relationship, while others argue that he only goes through the movements. As such, Brosnan has never identified "work". John Connery derives from Bond's role for the masses, Roger Moore was a light version, and even Brosnan's predecessor, Timothy Dalton, became known for his debut with a more solid bond decades before Craig did the same. But Brosnan really has no definitive feature. He certainly looked at the part and was just as attractive as you hope Bond will be in Goldenje. But not only his films are not gradually gradually as they continued, the actor himself does not have to remember a particular trait or define the characteristic of the relationship. Not that such is a requirement, it is just that this may have to do with his own wrong things to Brosnan for his time as 007.

The Irish actor obviously feels that he was never good enough in the role, to the point that he was unable to reconsider the fourth century films.

In 2020, Pierce Brosnan re -examines "Goldenje" (who almost acted by Timothy Dalton) For online Watch-up the same. As the actor admitted during the event, this was the first time he saw the film from what he did. It has been 25 years between the film's debut and the first time Brosnan saw it, which may not look so surprising, as it is not uncommon for actors to avoid watching their performances. But there seems to have been more than Brosnan's decision to stay away from Goldenje 25 years of the general advantage of not diverting their affairs.

Talking to Telegraph In 2014, the actor said he had never revised any of his Bond films because he thought he was "never good enough". In the interview, he reveals that his three sons often asked him to watch the movies with them, but he always refused. "I felt I was caught in time distorted between Roger and John," he said, adding:

"It was very difficult to grasp the meaning of me. The violence was never real, the brutal force of man was never visible. It was quite modest, and the characterization had no monitoring of reality, it was the surface.

Asked if he could ever rethink the films at the time, Brosnan said: "I have no desire to see myself as the Jamesesheims Bond. Because it's just never good enough. It's a terrible feeling. " Given the prestige of saga 007, it is understandable that Brosnan would feel self -conscious about making justice. But there is probably more than that.

During his Goldenje watch, Pierce Brosnan spoke to watch Goldfinger in 1964 and grew with John Connery's relationship, which certainly added to the pressure he felt when he took over in 1995. By the end of the redirection, it was positive, but heavy. "I don't know what to say," he said, "except that it was good while it lasted and there were new adventures to have." This is not a bad way to summarize his first redirection of the film, given that he was so disobedient that he avoided the quarter century.

Interestingly, this paragraph "new adventures to have" seems to be another aspect of his refusal to rethink movies. In an interview in 2022 with From a clubHe was asked whether he would rethink his films about Bond and said, "I don't especially enjoy watching the job. It's over. It's over. That's the next. "

Otherwise, there may have been some bitterness for the way his films after Goldenje had passed. As early as 2005, three years after his last release as 007 in "Die Another Day", Brosnan spoke CBS News About how the character "never felt real" about him and how he never felt he had "full ownership over Bond". Especially the question was the "stupid single" and the fact that he felt "set up with a contractual picture". In other words, it seems that Brosnan was really happy to leave Bond behind in 2002, which could only add to his desire not to rethink his performances.

Then, in many ways, similar to Connery himself, Bond's role was a two -edged sword For Brosnan, and there was much more than his refusal to rethink movies rather than just not like looking at the screen. Fortunately, we can reconsider them as many times as we want, even if it is only to have fun with the stupidity of "Die Another Day".