This article contains mild spoilers For "Captain America: Brave New World".

Save for exceptions such as "Deadpool" films, Logan Wolverine's Character Study, often forgotten "Punisher: War Zone", and the Chinese Universe in front of Marvel shakes like the "Blade" trilogy, MCC firmly in the land of the ratings. PG-13. This is the classification of Magic Ratings that most of the blockbuster movies are trying to fall because The PG-13 rating should, theoretically, complain to the widest range of viewers' viewers. Movies with a G or PG rating are usually considered "Kiddie Fare", while rating R or NC-17 is excluded by nature-and younger viewers would be separated from theater experience, which will certainly not help secondary markets like toys/ goods.

Setting MCU firmly in the PG-13 range is not just a smart decision from a business point of view, it is also a great way to maintain the consistency of storytelling and tone. If the audience was rapidly changing between babies for babies and the ultra-midfielder in the midfielder, it would be even harder to invest in MCC's connected multi-storey film and television. Unfortunately, the PG-13- ratings What was ironically created to solve the very problem that still possesses - It's still a deep disadvantage.

While the official MPA rating says parents are strongly warned because some material may be inappropriate for children under 13, the scope of what can be included in the PG-13 film is quite huge. "The Marvels", a MCU film featuring aliens similar to cats known as "Flacken Consuming People set on" Memory "by" Cats "by Andrew Lloyd Webber, has the same rating as" Captain America: Brave New World " (Read our review here), a film in which a military officer controlled by the mind dies with suicide after putting a gun in his mouth and pulling the trigger.

This is a huge range of presentations of violence.

I am not here to strive to dilute the content within the film than any part of the imagination, but for a series that is proud of the catering to a four-quadrant audience, there were more moments in "Captain America: a brave new world" that me made me surprise of their involvement. For one thing, Sam Wilson of Anthony Mackie says the word "s ***" probably five times during the film, and while I personally Think that the people who get the panties in a bunch of "naughty words" should overcome it, I have enough empathy to understand that Not every parent wants to educate their children as I did my.

Buying a ticket for their young man to watch Captain America saving the day, usually not coming up with an additional review that he will also swear at a bunch. "But" Falcon and Winter Soldier "was 16+ TV!" I hear you cry. Yes, this is true, but if Disney's viewing numbers+ have learned something, it is that many people's hell only go to the movies and completely ignore the MCC TVs on streaming. As for parents who buy tickets, the "brave new world" should not be more extreme than the Marveli.

Language should be the most non-problem as MCC has never been sworn in, but the real shocking was violence. I am a certified cinema -Siko and Loove The violence on the screen, but I again admit that I do not share POV to a member of the general audience. The fight in Marvel's films is nothing new, but there is intimacy and realism of "Captain America: The Brave New World" that simply ... does not feel in accordance with the recent wave of MCC films, focused on foreigners and supervisors. Particularly mentioned when a military officer shoots two inmates while under his mind control before turning his gun to himself.

And yes, adults could (and should) look for resources as parents of parents online before determining whether to take their children to the film, but ... That's exactly the problem. Why should the audience take another Step to dissection of what they will see in a movie if there are already MPA ratings, and why does it feel like a sister debate to trigger warning conversations?

How I wrote for before /movie As for the audience that requires content warnings in front of the script films that can be considered harmful or activating, the triggers vary from person to person, and even people who have a common trauma may not be activated by the same thing. A person can theoretically be activated by nothing, making it impossible to determine what is or is not "worthy" for activation warning. The same can be said about what is "acceptable" in the film PG-13. When you look at Official rules For the Assessment System, MPA explains that:

"The PG-13 movement image can exceed PG's assessment in topic, violence, nudity, sensuality, language, adult or other elements, but does not reach a limited category R. (...) Each drug use initially requires at least PG-13 rating.

"There may be displays of violence in the PG-13 film, but generally not real and extreme or persistent violence. PG-13 rating.

Using words like "short" and "generally" means that there is no real inflexible line to make sense of what feels like arbitrary rules. It also depends on human interpretation, which as we already know, they will vary wildly from person to person. That is why exactly the same implied sex scene with a straight couple is not considered "explicit" like that of a gay couple. If the MPA will not have difficult and quick rules about what or is not acceptable, then it is put in the Marvel studio to develop a series of its own internal boundaries - like their "without beheading" and "no smoking" rules. However, the unfortunate reality is that to encourage those rules further, stifle creativity and stimulate even more homogeneous films than what is already at the time of the screen.

Three years ago we highlighted that PG-13 rating has become pointless After the audience debated the ratings of "Doctor Strange and Multiversity of Madness". When it comes to Marvel movies, at least they are consistent.