JustinIts lawyers condemned Blake LivelyThe legal team is looking for a phone record in their ongoing legal plays.

Court documents received Our weeklyA letter was sent to the judge on Friday, February 7, Mitchell Shuster, who represents 41 -year -old Baldoni and represented the studios of his production company Wafer.

In the papers, the documentation of calls or text messages in the papers, the documentation of multiple cell phone companies has condemned Lively's legal team for issuing subpanus if they seek the document of "different parties" and "different party individuals". Shoster has claimed that Livley's lawyers have requested the location of the call log, text log, data log and location of the cell site. "

"It is hard to consider how wide, aggressive and atticles are really these sub -pubenas. This is a civic suit, not a criminal case, and the vibrant parties are not FBI, "the letter was written in the letter. Yet the subpoenas are full call and text history of each goal during several years (not the sender, not the recipient or subject matter) but in the same period , Reflecting logs by looking at real-time position information and data, among other issues, web browsing history "" "

Shoster argued that this step was "severely" the opportunity to "exceed" permissible discovery. " Although Baldoni's team does not object to the use of third -party discoveries on both sides, they suggest that it was done in "legally approved fashion".

"Weefer's parties are deeply concerned that lively parties fear the third parties in providing information about our clients (and various non-party), legal communication, treatment related information, with attorney and appropriate in civic suit (or even Legal) provides more information than "Transparent communication and real-time location information," Shoster wrote. "Subpoyenus forms an obvious abuse of the invention process and if allowed to stand up to stand - once their blaster is extinct - we are confident that the advice of the vital parties will not be ready to accept their own client's personal information and In the communication. "

Baldoni's legal party has claimed that they “Honored” by the side of Lively In the subpoenas, however, the parties were "unable to resolve the dispute." Shoster asked the judge to consider the "extreme time sensitive" because some "cellular suppliers have already indicated that they have intended to adhere to subpoenas."

Lively, 37, and Baldonir Legal war Kicked after acting in the film in 2024 It ends with usThe In December 2021, Lively filed a case against Baldoni, complaining to him sexual harassment, emotional crisis and more. Baldani denied the allegations and filed a defamation case against her husband, lively for $ 1 million, Ryan RenoldsAnd its preacher Leslie sloinThe

Ours Friday confirmed that Lively was a team The records of the phone are subpoured Baldoni, filmmaker Jame Heath and Weefer's Studios Steve Sarovits are trying to find evidence of Smair's promotion against the actress.

A representative from Lively told us in a statement, "The phone records of all the independent defendants will publish the full web of the people involved in promoting the memory against Mrs. Lively." "These national records will also provide critical and unreasonable evidence not only to whom, when and how and how their revenge plan was combined."

Baldoni's lawyer Brian Friedman told us in a response that "the subpenus is a common part of the case."

“The wonderful thing is what the lively parties are looking for. They are asking for each call, text, data log and even real-time position information regardless of the sender, recipient or subject, "he said in a statement." This huge phishing campaign proves that they are for their proper false claims. They are asking for a real foundation. "