These days, Sandra Bullock is basically a Hollywood royal family. She is the winner of the Academy Award nominated for the best actress Oscar twice, makes pretty consistent good moviesIt occasionally appears in buzz projects like the "Lost City" and "Eight Ocean" and is one of the most recognizable performers in the entire industry. However, in the 1990s and 2000s, Bullock was quite known for one genre: romantic comedies. Now, one of her funniest, brightest films makes waves on Netflix, after landing at the number four of Top 10 films on February 10, 2025 (as published by Flixpatrol).
"Miss of Introduction", which hit theaters in 2000, throws Bullock like Gressy Hart, a FBI's special nail agent, who never makes much effort to appear "Damak" or "nice". This approach does not cause any problems for her in general, but when the case appears that includes a bomb threat at the Texas beauty page, the desk decides to reinforce Grassi, to install it as Miss Newu Jerseyers (because that competitor is soon to get like And if, disqualified), and make it go hidden to find out who is behind the threat. Although it is initially resistant and really establishes a fight with his pages coach Victor Melling (Divine Funny Michael Caine), Grassi ends unexpectedly to hang out on the page and eventually learns that sisterhood is important ... and that her new friends are Arens Arens Arens Arens Aryens Arens. "As superficial as he initially thought.
Honestly, "Miss of Construction" is a charming, funny movie elevated with his performances - but what do critics think about when he first came out? Not much, obviously.
Miss Construction was a critical miss, but it's one of Sandra Bullock's favorite films
Critics were rough For "Miss Construction" when it first came out. The Rotten tomatoesThe film only has a 41% rating of the tomatometer - it officially makes it "spoiled" - and the critical consensus states: "Although critics say (Sandra) Bullock is funny and charming, it cannot overcome the bad screenplay that makes the film feel Too much as a soft, non -serious sitcom. " Roger Ebert obviously had a similar idea; As he wrote in His review, "It's not bad as much as there is no ambition to be more than obvious." Writing for Washington PostMichael O'Sullivan was a lot Appearance: "Jokes are trimmed, setting up is stupid and bullock, occasionally, ruthless comedy and here co-producer, it is disturbing as a hook."
Despite the harsh full rating, a small number of critics actually had good things to say about "Miss of Construction". For Time outDerek Adams simply wrote: "Although there may not be many surprises, there is a little disliking." Elsewhere, William Thomas on Magazine Empire It seemed to have really enjoyed it, writing: "Original crowded with people who boasts a charming twist on the starvet," Miss Inbornness "is really hard to dislike, but hey, sometimes worth the trial." Mark Savlov, a review of the film about Chronicle in AustinEven gave Bullock specifically: "It's a measure of comic talent (bullock) that she makes this creamy slip on film as a real engaged as it is."
Regardless of what critics said about "Miss of Construction" when it came out, it is still a major part of Bullock's filmography; Just pay attention to social media every year when, on April 25, everyone publishes the clip of the island of Hiders Burns, Miss Rod Island, Cheryl Frasier, the wrong, the wrong question for the "perfect date". (As she says, April 25 is the perfect date because "not too cold" and "Not too hot" and "All you need is an easy jacket.")
Unfortunately, Miss of Construction 2: Armed and miraculous was a total accident
Sometimes the sequel is just a terrible idea. Unfortunately, this was definitely true of the sequel to "Miss Construction", which carries the "armed and beautiful" subtitles and carries by Sandra Bullock, Ernie Hudson and Heather Burns are returning with newcomers Regina King and Didrich Bader. This time, Gressi's secret identity as an FBI agent has been blown after trying to return to the field (which with her previous escapes of beauty, have done something infamous), leading to a "spokesman" for the FBI under some Forcing and receiving your own bodyguard, Sam Fuller (King). When Cheryl and the host of the first film, Stan Shields (returning to William Shatner), were kidnapped for ransom, Grassi and Sam should go to Las Vegas to save them.
"Miss of Introduction 2: Armed and Wonderful" There is only a grade of 16% on rotten tomatoesthat is Especially Bad, and critics did not abstain. Writing for Rogerebert.comRichard Roper probably put him best when he said: "This, for me, is a classic example of a sequel that was done just because the first earned money. I didn't like the first. " Wesley Morris, writing about Boston GlobeMake a proper claim that "nothing with so many people in traction should not feel this traction", while Roger Ebert was similar to a blunt in his review of Chicago Sun-Times: "There is no good reason to go and actually see."
Critics were right, unfortunately; "Miss the Introduction 2" kind of stench. (Poor king, years before She scored for "Guardians" And an Oscar for "If Bale Street could talk", ended up in this And "Legally blonde 2: red, white and blonde," is evolving with two bad sequels that never match the heights of their predecessors.) The first film, which is Actually funNow breaks it on Netflix.
Source link