Not only was Baldoni his apartment, but he was the director of the film, who put him in the position of power over the alumin "Gossip girls". He accused her alive to use this power to be sexually harassed and the body embarrasses is on the set. Baldoni, on the other hand, accused that he was trying to cross the creative control of the film from him.

So who is right? Who is wrong? With a lawsuit flying on both sides, it remains to be seen who will win in court, but in the court of public opinion, the nervical ship seems slowly to sink.

Movement #Metoo may no longer be in the center of attention as it used to be, but it didn't stop women that they were sexually harassed on movie rallies. But is that really what happened here? Given the information that occurred to the light, it seems that it was lively in the set in the set and maybe it was justified in feeling so. Without being there to testify first-hand things, it is difficult for someone to conclude about what really happened behind the closed door.

Lots of people would say that if she would be so unpleasant for Baldonia, she should wake her concern with him long ago before filming wrapped. And I agree with that. Is FER to file a lawsuit after the film has already finished? That she was harassed as she claims, then yes, maybe, if there is afraid of revenge, but the evidence that has so far appeared doesn't seem like a woman who afraid to use her voice.

Baldoni's team leaked a rif of speech information and even Launch your own website entitled "Lawy Information" sharing alleged text messages involving themselves, vibrant, and her husband, Ryan Reynolds. This situation has a spiral, so it didn't control that even a live friendly friend, pop star Taylor Swiftdragged into a lawsuit. Ultimately, however, looks like she was lively that she put it there.

When you will record a romantic drama that deals with domestic violence, you need a coordinator for intimacy on the set. "It ends with us" he had a coordinator for intimacy, but according to Baldonie-amended appeals listed on his website, she lively decided to skip the starting meeting where the scenes were out on the screen and to play on the screen.

After "rejecting" the meeting, Baldoni claims that it was placed in "less of an ideal position that the relay of this note should live in its penthouse" and uses the "" Orgasm "," "forgag. "

His lawyers claim that "these notes later became the basis for appealing alive, in which she would state that Baldoni will talk about their sex life and put the chest scenes live."

After reading her lawsuit, this conversation seems to be part of her harassment requirement, but it is worth noting that they have made some strange comments on work with the Intimacy Coordinator. In an interview of August 2024. With Access to HollywoodSome unusual comments are lively to be their own coordinator for intimacy on the set. "By the way, it shouldn't happen. I just want to be clear," she said when she asked how it was like "to be the coordinator of intimacy in some of these sexy scenes."

"You should not be an intimacy coordinator. You should definitely hire coordinators for intimacy," she added. "Which we had, thank God."

The interviewer then described the "sexy scene" in which she lervously taught Baldoni as "pull" inside. When she was lively asked where the interviewer saw the clip, he was actually the author Colleen Hoover Who jumped into the conversation and said she saw him on Instagram. They lived uncomfortable seemed to withdraw the ends of her hair and mutilated a little while continued with the interview.

At the end of January, behind the scenery scenery, the romantic dance scenes are online. Video, obtained by TMZIt shows them to exchange an unpleasant banner as they sway back and forth. This scene is important because it was directly described in alive as evidence that Baldons harassed her.

According to the court, he lively claimed that Baldoni "leaned forward and slowly dragged his ears and down the neck," how Mrs. False later objected, Mr. Baldoni's answer was: "I'm not attracted to you. "

In Video, Baldoni makes a clumsy joke about his nose "so big" after gently calling attention to it. He tells him lively, "I'm probably getting ready to be on you," the Baldoni suits: "It smells well."

He certainly puts a picturesque description of the scene in perspective.

According to the Baldona's lawsuits, it was meant to "change the" Taylor Swift's issues "to use his song" My Tear Ricochet "in the film trailer, unless her requirements were met. The requirements in this case, asked the rights to the film. The submission at the submitted Baldoni included an alleged exchange of text from Sony Executive, who read:

"Blake calls Taylor to approve the song. Since, of course appeared to seek time with (redacted) her editor. We know that he is conditionally signing the contract, but wondering if you would review (redacted) can be released The trailer and Blake do not change her opinion by calling Taylor Swift. "

Another alleged text message shows the Baldonium and a vibrant address of a script change that is lively wanted to do. Text messages deal with a meeting that took place in a lively Penthouse, with both Reynolds and Swifts.

Baldoni told her that "really" liked the changes she made and senses that they made the roof in question more "fun and interesting", but noted to "felt like that without Ryan and Taylor".

The lively then compared to the character of "throne Games", allegedly appropriate:

"I happen to have a few dragons. For better or worse, but usually for better. Because my dragons for making up the ones I'm fighting. So we all use mine. (I can promise you."

It remains to be seen how Taylor Swift feels about the "beautiful monster". Conflict reports appeared about their friendship, but it is worth noting that they were not photographed together since October. Other reports indicated that Swift should never have been in a meetingBut just happened to happen when Swift went to visit his friend.

Animal attempt to promote the film has already met with Memes after the film referred to the film as a traditional Rom-Com and encourage fans to "grab your girlfriends, carrying your floral" to the theater. Maybe a little on the nose He talks about a girl named Lily that leads a flowering, but the online fans felt that she was inappropriately reducing the film about the domestic violence in something more.

According to the Baldonian-amended appeal on his website, he lively cut into his productive team and asked them to find the guilty of negative presses to obtain as she promoted the film, which also included Interrupted interview with her is rude for journalists.

According to Baldonija's court documents, lively and Reynolds "require (ed)" that their statement is released on Baldonija and the name of his company and that refusal to do "gloves." It is quite clear that Baldoni's manufacturing team has never published a statement, and gloves really descended.

So when it comes to Justin Baldoni vs. Blake Lively, who will go out on top?

Kristin says, when it comes to the court of public opinion, Baldoni has an upper hand. Lowed dirty laundry on all sides of the Internet to see (including an Awkwward 2 am voice memo) In an effort to justify the living receivables. He wants clear that her allegations do not have merit, and judging by what has been exposed so far, it certainly makes it lively as an aggressor.

At the same time, she is lively married for Ryan Reynolds and is suspicious that her career will - or his, for that thing - affect the lawsuit, which is currently not planned until March 2026. years. Baldoni has already achieved a legal victory Monday when The judge refused a living request for Gag commandWhich means that even more evidence will probably share in the coming weeks.

It may be difficult to pick up the pieces of career no matter how his legal battle took place, but it can go out of all the providence that it is not lively in the way that it has also claimed to be sufficient.