Is one battle after another a secret scientific movie? Every notion you missed

The following contains spoilers for "one battle after the other".

Paul Thomas Anderson is one of our best executives. He is responsible for incredible psychological plays with dysfunctional characters who face excellent internal turmoil. What Anderson has not done, however, is to make a big film for the genre. Although it shares some initials with director "Resident Evil" Paul VS Anderson, PTA has never made a scientific movie-to now? Maybe?

"One battle after another", Anderson's new EP, is a fierce political action-comedy-triller And the best film from 2025 to the present. The film tells a story of revolutionaries who are forced to watch as time slips through the fingers and the dream they once fought is crashed before their eyes, as long as the promise of a better future has been stolen and buried in the ground. But not everyone is lost. 16 years later, there are still those fighting tyranny to make things better, including people struggling with less flashing battles, however, they risk all this to encourage the revolution ahead before disappearing from the film's plot (Unlike the hunters of the vampires of Chokotav in "sinners").

Anderson has made one of the darkest films since 2025 as it captures the feeling of anger and despair that today is so widespread. And yet, "one battle after another" is quite vague when it comes to its timeline. Loose based on Thomas Pinchon's "Vineland", the film definitely moves the action from the 1960-1984 source frame, but where? Although the widespread feeling seems to be that the film begins in the late 2000s, and then jumps forward to this day, there are a few details that suggest that the latest sex Thomas Anderson actually begins in the present before continuing to the future. That's the case: Anderson may have made his first scientific movie hidden.

One battle after another may be a little futuristic film

The first term is more thematic than anything. "One battle after another" begins with the French 75, a revolutionary group, a raid on the migrant detention center somewhere in California. If the film was really set up 16 years ago, as early as 2009, there was a failed revolutionary movement, then it would make sense for it to be inspired by the Occupy Wall Street movement than immigration. Yes, detention centers were highlighted over the years of Obama, but they did not become the focus of this conversation to the Trump era.

Not too long after this raid, when Perfidia Beverly Hills (Tejana Taylor) is trapped by police officers after a banking bank robbery (in which members of the French 75 specially wear the type of surgical masks used by Kovid-19 defenders), one of the revolutionaries with a very smart This seems to mean that the first act of the film takes place in the current day, not before it.

When "one battle after another" jumps 16 years in the future, not much has changed, followed by how police states are trying to create an eternal present where the regime is eternal and unwavering (as the film claims). After this there is only one obvious example of technological change: the DNA test kit. Indeed, when Lokjav of John Penn (the best movie villain of 2025) Prepares to determine if Villa Ferguson (Chase Infiniti) is his daughter, he uses a futuristic look of a purse with an instant DNA testing device. This seems to be not something that exists today in the real world, and until the film stands for it, it is significantly different from everything we see in the film.

Why the timeline of one battle after another is important

Pinhon's Vinneland is about how revolutions fail and leave things to gather the next generation. The timeline of the book is very specific because it commented on how the spirit of change and revolution in the 1960s died, leading to oppression and consumer since the 1980s. "One battle after another" makes a few changes in its original materialBut the time frame can be the most significant.

If the film actually starts in our present before jumping forward on time, it offers a pretty dark and cynical view of our current state - but not completely hopeless. No, Paul Thomas Anderson does not say that the resistance of fascism in 2025 is in vain and we just have to leave it to the next generation. Instead, the film specifically displays different types of revolutionary movements and acts of resistance. Twice, it shows people who directly face the authorities to fight for justice - at the beginning, when the French 75 launches the raid of the detention center, and later when the Baktan Cross people are protesting on the streets against Lokjav troops - and twice, it ends badly. The French 75 have been handed over or captured or killed, while the Baktan protest is infiltrated by Lokjav's forces and his participants are beaten. But the underground resistance of Benissio del Toro, Sensei Carlos is much more successful and very clearly widespread.

"One battle after another" ended up filming before the US presidential election in 2024, so the film does not speak explicitly about our current situation. However, the time of its release adds a layer of urgency to its message to resist, act and build a revolution based on the community that creates shrines such as Baktan Cross and legitimately helping people, even when everything looks serious. And, of course, we may have portable, immediate instances for DNA testing by the 2030s.

"One battle after another" is currently being played in cinemas.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *