The direct consideration of Ridley Scott, attractive, gives the impression that he does not really regret. Said the man who, in the play "Blade Runner". "I don't like the discussion. I know exactly what I want (...) It's the director's job," he doesn't seem to be one for reminiscing or lost in any nostalgic rivals. But even he complains, and it seems that he is not particularly about to take a piece of Chinese history after filming Blade Runner.

Scott's real regrets includes two legendary scientific franchises In Alien and Blade Runner. Simply put, the director has never secured the rights of anyone and has struggled to retain all kinds of ownership over the direction of the two franchises since then, although he made Denis Vilnev's executive production in 2017 "Blade Runner 2049" (wonderful tracking that also served as a cautious box office). He also directed two "alien" prophecies with Prometheus in 2012 and "Alien: Testament" in 2017 Occasionally, the effective but safe sequel "Alien: Romulus" As a producer in 2024, but otherwise he had to abandon the creative control of the two franchises, and that clearly bothered him over the years. As the director said Hollywood reporter"I had to conclude (the" alien franchise "and" Blade Runner ", as he did (Steven) Spielberg with" Jurassic ", and everything he does, and the Jameses Cameron did with what he has."

But this is not the only discovery that has hit Scott in the years after he made two of the biggest scientific films in the history of the cinema. In 2025, he revealed that, aside from wanting to retain some ownership of the IP that helped to establish himself, he also wants to literally own parts of his previous films. Specifically, he regrets that he did not steal the Voight-KampFF machine from the Blade Runner set.

In Blade Runner, titular sales hunters use a Voight-KampFF test to determine whether the individual is a replicator or not. Includes asking a series of questions and measuring answers to the individual, breathing and heart rate to redness and dilation of puppies. Basically it was a futuristic form of a lies detector, and in fact it first appeared in the novel that was loosely based "Blade Runner", "Did Philip K. Dick's Androids dream of electric sheep?" Built by visual effects veteran Michael Fink, the real film machine appears over the course of The incredible scene for opening And he reappeared at different times, including Rick Decard's interview with Rachael (John Young). It was a retrofurist Marvel with a series of screens and meters CRT along with a pump (for some reason) and a retina scanner rising from the machine's body. Then, it is not so surprising that Ridley Scott is crazy that he did not take him home so much beloved piece of science science history.

In an interview with The GuardianScott was asked if he took the test to diagnose the "Wojt-Campf" empathy from the Blade Runner set and revealed that the release of that props was one of his biggest regret. "Is that machine not great?" He said. "Some bastards stole it from the set. When it appears on the market, I will go after them as a rat to the drain." According to the director, he never took souvenirs from the sets of his films, preferring to continue to expect. "I would think," I ended up, move on, "he explained. But it seems as time goes on, Scott recognized the value of taking certain props when he could. He continued:

"I get permission to get things and put space suits from movies in my vineyard in France. I have a space suit from Marsian. I have an original space suit from Alien. Can you imagine what it's worth? They are all in my barrel, which has 12,000 square meters of barrels.