BARSTOOL SPORTS FOUNDER Dave Portnoy He caused a heated debate after weighing Jimmy Kimmelsudden cancellation. After the decision of ABC to withdraw "Jimmy Kimmel live!" After controversial remarks of late night hosts Charlie KirkThe assassination of Portnoy took him to X (earlier Twitter) to claim that Kimmel's shooting does not actually qualify as "Cancellation of Culture". His comments quickly went a virus, drawing the return panel, support and a lot of fire discussion on where the line between culture, free speech and consequence is really lying.

In his post, Portnoy claimed that the shooting of Jimmy Kimmel does not actually qualify as cancellation of culture:

"With Kimmel, a lot of people who talk about the hypocrisy of culture cancellation. It seemed to get away from the show to listen to SH-T," when a person says culture. But when a person says something that someone says that tons of people are offensive, rude, rude in real time and then that person is punishable for it, it is not cancellation of culture. These are the consequences for your actions. "

Portnoy's attitude immediately shared social media, with some praise his difference and others cut him like splitting hair.

One viral answer was ridiculed by Portnoy's logic, writing, "so let me fix this for you. If you finish you for old Tweets, but if you can finish your real-time, it is justice. Very legal.

The other user accused Portnoy of "Rating a drink", "You don't think it's a cancellation of culture because the rage came quickly. But the Flash Meeting WiFi is still trial. What you defend is a digital execution."

Others were accused by Portnoy normalized the "algorithm morale", the idea of ​​publicly bitter online now serving as a judge, jury and executor.

Not everyone agreed. Some defended Jimmy Kimmel, insisting on comedians should not face a dismissal due to controversial material, regardless of timing.

"I don't agree," one user wrote. "Returning through old posts is part of culture and should be a statute of restrictions for all this fake indignation. They should not even pull them out, they do not look at them in creative spaces should not be in favor of cancelling culture from any angle."

For others, the question was not about time at all, but about who pressed ABC to act. Many highlighted the comments of FCC Brendan Carrget that suggests Disney can lose licenses if he did not punish Jimmy Kimmel.

"You're right. This is not a cancellation of culture. It is much worse. It is a government's threatening retaliation, unless ABC solves Kimmel. This is a direct violation of freedom of speech," one person is.

Another added: "It doesn't matter how you call it. It's important that it was canceled for the government's pressure, which came through the FCC - that's a problem."