In the new archiving he claimed that her "she ends with us" stars that this move, not mentioned that he did not do it in the previous months and that the alleged deposit time falls after the discovery closed.
Justin Baldoni and Blake Lively are currently fixed in a lawsuit for sexual harassment, which she liveled against Baldoni after their work together on film.
The article continues below the advertisement
Blake Lively calls for the court to deny Justin Baldoni more time to dispose of Taylor Swift

Less than 24 hours after the team of Justin Baldonia, he claims that Taylor Swift agreed to sit for the deposition, blightly discharged with an answer, inviting the court to assign an actor more time for storing singers.
In his own application 12. September, the legal legal team claimed that Baldoni had been postponed for too long in search of the deposition, pointing out that "discovery lasts more than six months."
They further claimed that Baldoni lawyers did not reach for Swift representatives until this before this week, and even if it agreed, proposed dates from 20. to 25. October falls out of the deadline of the court discovery.
The article continues below the advertisement
"At any time, in the past six months (Baldonije's team) he could notice the deposition, he served in court judgment and negotiated the pleasant time and place for this deposition. But they did not" read the submission, according to Now per week.
He further read, "now, long after the date and location for all other parties and agreed (they) come to this Court and attend this deposition alone after the parties and ten days after the parties are due to the exchange of professional reports."
The article continues below the advertisement
The actress claimed that Justin Baldoni disrespected Taylor Swift Privacy

In her archiving, he also exploded the Baldoni, claiming that his Push for the tag in this stage showed "lack of diligence" and neglect for quick "privacy and schedule".
He further claimed that the actor intended to delay "the media spectacle in this issue" seemingly referring as Baldoni and his team withdrew in court documents and the issuance of court judicial to present him months before, but later.
"Such shown would show that the discovery was closed, especially for the third party, but is even more relevant to this third party, which (Baldoni's team) in this issue generates a media spectacle in this issue," reading is also to generate a media spectacle.
The article continues below the advertisement
The Pop Star lawyer claims never agreed to be overthrown

SWIFT's lawyer banged from Baldonij's camp since then, who agreed to be overthrown in his lasting legal revenge with his former friend, I live.
Toward Daily mailThe lawyer noted that the singer would only participate if he was primarily forced to do so, emphasizing that there is no "material role" in the former court case.
Letter from the Swift Legal Team read: "Furthermore, my client did not agree to the deposition, we have advised (after the first hearing of the time required during the 20th. October if the parties could succeed in being able to be parties to do their disputes."
The article continues below the advertisement
Blake won her in her suggestion for sealing his deposition

Before the trial in May 2026. years, Baldonije's defense suffers several losses, with one of the most recent beings of the judge decision on the cutting of lively deposition from court Docket, Po Deadline.
"The position of the entire parties, almost 300 pages - after the two pages in the letter, was not appropriate for the lively lively (and as a result of the court) and invite the judge Lewis Liman, and his associates that make fun.
Liman issued an order in response to a lively proposal that her delay was sealed, in which he claimed that the parties of the passengers did not show the overall deposition, nor could they either.
He added, the conclusion is inevitable that the travel parties submitted free quantities of irrelevant sites so that if vibrant move to continuous sealing of non-public pages, then important parties could use lively responsibility for their public relations needs. "
The article continues below the advertisement
Justin Baldonije's calculation against Blake Lively was fired in June

The second task for Baldonium came when Judge Liman fired his constructing against Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds.
After the lively sued him at the end of last year, Baldoni submitted Baldonia in January, and a search of $ 400 million damage.
But in June, that case was rejected, together with separate defamatization, he brought against the New York Times through his coverage of live receivables of sexual harassment.
While the judge noticed Baldoni's legal team can also change the refinitions of certain requirements, in the end it failed.
"Instead of the audit of existing receivables, our clients will be carried out by additional legal options available to us," Baldonije's lawyer, Bryan Freedman, said People Magazine In June.
Source link