Blake Lively A. Fire back Justin After he reveals Taylor Swift Agreed to sit in the statement as part of their ongoing legal fight, Our weekly Can report exclusively.

On Friday, September 12, in his new filing, 38 -year -old Lively claimed that Baldoni (1) and his team "repeatedly tried to bring (fast) to the case to increase their relentless media strategy." He opposed Baldoni to give extra time to discover and said that he had waited very long for the Swift, 35, Deposes. (Ours Reported before Friday Baldoni's team worked with a team for SwiftWho is not available until the end of October.)

Lively's team argued, "In this latest attempt (Baldoni and his party), it was thought to have been 'agreed' for some time to sit in the statement for some time in the (about three weeks after the end of the discovery of this matter) without significantly proof.

The actress team has claimed that Baldoni's team has not even contacted Swift's team about the statement until the beginning of this week. Livelie's party says that if they accept that claim at a mouthful, Swift's proposed deposit date will be a few weeks after the cut -off date to discover.

Lively attorney argued, "In this case, (Baldoni and his team) lack of perseverance and (Swift) privacy and disrespect to the schedule," Lively's attorney argued. "The invention has been running for more than six months, and (Swift) one whose calendar should be filled with professional obligations a few months ago. At any time of the last six months, (Baldoni's party) may notice a statement, a subpina can serve, and they can talk for this deposit.

The vibrant Baldoni's lawyers were preceded before Subpoyena issued Swift in May.

"Now, without an explanation, all other parties and third-party witnesses have been discussed with much later discussions and ever served and have agreed without any serving, a new notice of a sub-coach, Wafer's accused has come to this court-and after the demand for more than ten days, after ten days, and after ten days of discovery." After more than a day "after the discovery of the fact"

Lively team says Baldoni's team does not explain their requirements for Swift. His lawyer noted, "This type of exhibition will be expected for any statement after the end of the invention, especially for the third party, but more relevant to this third party, whom (Baldoni's party) has tried to construct a media philosophy on this topic."

Claimed to be rejected by vigorous claims.

As Ours Earlier, Swift representatives spoke about issuing a subpoena on May 9.

"Taylor Swift never set foot in this movie set, he was not involved in any ing or creative decision, he did not go the goal, he never saw the editing or made any notes in the picture, he didn't even see. It ends with us A few weeks after its public release, and traveling around the world in the title of the largest tour of history during the 2023 and 2024 period, "Swift said.

"The connection to this film was allowed to use a song, 'My Tears Recochet'. These 19 artists were also given a song license for the film, this document was designed to create a tabloid clickbeat instead of focusing on the truths of the subpoena, and used to create public interest.

The case is scheduled for trial in May 2026.