Moviemaking has passed a long way than the days when Johnon Wayne almost died in the set of "Noah's Chest". At the time, it seemed that a Hollywood had before the code seemed to be arguing with accessories without care in the world. Today, throwing tons of water on a set and leaving actors and accessories to die or suffer from serious injuries would be unthinkable. But while the film sets are, compared to the sinner in the 1920s, safer than they were once, it took a long time for Hollywood to really descend and provide security to his castes and teams.

Take "Indiana Ons: Thieves of the lost casket". Steven Spielberg's action adventure was filmed in 1980, a good half -century after the Duke managed to avoid the brush with the death of the Noah's casket. As such, you might hope that everything on the set of "Indiana Ons: Thieves" was up and up, but Spielberg was surprisingly careless while making the movie. For one thing, None of the set in Indiana Onesons was safe from the pythonsAnd Even Spielberg was thrilled to make Starwarr Harrison Ford and his team trick Through production alive.

In a piece for American Association of CinematographersThe director has once told how he made Ford himself surpass the rock with a fiberglass of £ 300 for the now legendary open segment of the film. "I was an idiot that I allowed him to try it," he wrote. Then, Spielberg was clearly in the Renegadian era of his career while making Indiana Onesons's inaugural film and it spread to his relationship with his studio supporter, Paramount Pick. Indeed, it seems that the young director was not entirely honest with the company of how long it would take to shoot the film, which given how things turned out to be the difference that Ford exceeds the 300-pound rock-probably the right choice.

When Indiana Onesons creator George Lucas initially searched for a studio to support his adventurous film, it turned out difficult. The director of the "Starwells War" struggled to receive support mostly due to the $ 20 million project budget. Fortunately, Paramount eventually agreed, but Lucas was still trying to keep costs and had to convince the studio that Steven Spielberg was the director of the job. I just used the critical flop that was 1979 "1941" (which even admitted Spielberg, went wrong), He was not very demanding, though the film was a modest success in the box office. Diring things, the comedy appeared in the budget. Even after Paramount calmed down and Spielberg got the job "Indiana Ons: Thieves", he was looking forward to prove he could make a good movie without being wasted.

In his article by the American Association of Cinematographer, the director wrote about economical films of the utmost importance, revealing that he "wanted to make" Indiana Ons: thieves "economically and make it look like $ 40 million and, in fact, spent only $ 20 million." He kept secret from everyone, including the studio.

In order to adhere to his secret schedule, Spielberg developed a shooting style, which included shooting much less than you would usually like. After all, that approach resulted in a classic film, even if the director endangered his team in the process.

Explaining how he managed to adhere to the reduced 73 -day recording schedule, Steven Spielberg described how he reduced the number of downloads he made for each scene. "I just discovered that by not making 15 downloads on each footage, but only to say, three to five downloads, I was able to insert much more spontaneity into the film with less complacency and pretentiousness." Often, that spontaneity was driven by forces out of Spielberg's control, such as when Harrison Ford improvised classic moment "Indiana Ons: Thieves" Because he and many Members of the cast and crew agreed a serious case of dysentery And, he just wanted to finish the scene - which no doubt helped Spielberg keep his step with his secret schedule. The director was also reportedly on average 35 settings a day, which was far from typical, but surely helped him further to stay on schedule. In his piece of ASC, he wrote:

"I didn't have much time to try different things, but I think I made enough movies that include terrible logistics -" jaws "," close encounters ", and" 1941 " - for me to finally get my diploma, graduate both with honor and unwanted and enter the field where I can make a movie."

In other words, he knew he was a good director until he came to make "Indiana Ons: Thieves" to the point that Paramont's blessing needed to reduce the schedule, and even to know how he was doing the film - which, given that he almost killed his cascades.