The controversial, improved version of Victor Fleming 1939 Fantasy Classic "Wizard of Oz" Finally, premiered last night in the Las Vegas field, and early reactions suggest that this shortened presentation (reduced from 102 minutes to 75 minutes) will be wildly separating. And those who opposed this seemingly descenting the desired film from the time it was published have a new reason to curse their existence.

During his introduction for the premiere of the premiere, Sphere Co. Choncho Discovered the Dolan Jameses That he took the freedom to order AI of employee technicals to replace Muncin's two people with the evil visions of himself and Warner Bros. CEO David Zalavl. This is nothing less than vandalism and serves as a reminder that we simply cannot trust these contemptible billionaires to properly do it from many treasures in their film and television libraries.

According to Dolan, media executives appear only in the film for two seconds. Visual FX Supervisor Ben Grossman clearly predicting the F5's social networking tornado, this discovery would have been flogged, to reassure viewers that the people in question were "unreserved characters who were too vague to be identified", so they were not replaced. However, those bodies belong to two accessories that may have been able to tell their family and friends where they briefly appeared in the "Wizard of Oz", and now their presence in the film has been turned into an inner joke that few will receive and those who find it terribly unusual.

Unfortunately, according to some people who have seen the version of the film in the sphere, there are more crimes in this 75-minute disgust.

Until I have seen the version of the "Wizard of Oz" sphere, I oppose it on moral grounds as a piece of propaganda for Environmentally destroying technology That our planet simply cannot support it. The General AI is also a plagiarism machine that, as a writer, is disgusting me at every level.

Versatile film critic Peter Debrig, who is well acquainted in cinema history, like any of my colleagues, gave the presentation fair footage and his review Not a complete pan. He was kicked out of the warmer experience (the tornado sequence sounds like it is highlighting), and got a blow from flying monkeys (spinning around the sphere through drones), but it sounds like the AI ​​process to blow the film of its humanity. After Debridge:

"The appearance and expressions of the actors are limited by the original recordings, and the most disturbing change for me was any strange AI technique used to replace Yudi Garland's face with a colorless plastic glow (where film grain and gentle lighting gave it.

Legend of the screen like yudi Garland It deserves much better than this.

That AI is not an ethically viable tool when used for art creation is unsuccessful to me, but it seems that most studio directors are Dead Set Use of Ai Rampino And, of course, in the case of the "Wizard of Oz", irresponsible. I mean, Dolan and Zadlav are trolling here, but they are so unclean and arrogant that I can't be sure. Regardless, they deserve to be dragged in the bad place and returning to this heinously abusing masterpiece -which has delighted filmmakers of all ages for 86 years. What they did was similar to drawing Mona Lisa.