One underestimated aspect of the Harry Potter franchise is that, as much as Hogwarts is a magical place where so many children would like to attend, it is also a parody of old -fashioned British schools. There were (and there are still) many of those types of schools in the real world, complete with a reputation for a privileged, something strange student body. In the books and films "Harry Potter", you can see this stereotypical terrible behavior of boarding in the sliter house; Its students are shown as a bunch of old money, often believe (usually properly) that they can get out with nothing.

Harry Potter's property surpasses the antetet by not only disturbing rich cramps, but also by the obvious majority of them supporters of Lord Voldemort, the equivalent of Adolf Hitler's wizard. The slopes are so terrible that with the last book "Harry Potter", when the school is preparing to fight Voldemort's army in a big battle, students from Slittar refuse to join. Those who remain do it on behalf of Voldemort, not the school.

So how did this happen? No one expected the world of wizard to be perfect, but it was certainly not so far as her Central School of Wizard would encourage an open wicked home student for generations in the end. Are the similar ones really this scary? Or is there an unreliable narrator situation here?

In the first book "Harry Potter", readers are treated on a song from the sorting cover that describes all Hogwarts houses. The hat occupies a charity tone in its various descriptions, but it is immediately clear that one of these houses is not like the others. "In Slitter, you will make your true friends," says the sorting hat, "those crafty people use any means to achieve their goals."

This is not a really compliment, right? During the books, the most positive feature attributed to slyterrins is that they are "ambitious", although this is an adjective that is neutral at best. The Griffindors are described as brave, equation as smart, and Hufflepufs as kinda and loyal; Describing Slatitkin as "cunning" and "ambitious" sure it seems to be a red flag in comparison. It seems not even true. Do Slitrin's students want Crab or Goal have ever encountered ambitious for someone?

The other key feature of a Sliter student is that they have pure blood, which means that their parents are from the family of wizards. Although students born in Mugl from time to time end in Slitter, it is a rare occurrence, especially since many similarly (especially Harry's rival, Draco Malfoy) show a clear contempt for their peer -born peers. There is even a slurry for them ("muddy plates") that only similarly seems to enjoy throwing around. And while being a racist, it's not considered a key feature of being slitin (the sorting hat certainly never mentions it), it seems to be a major unofficial feature.

In addition to being hungry for power and racist, the biggest loss of PR for Slitrin during the Harry Potter franchise The dark wizard killed by Harry's parents, Voldemort himselfHe was once a student at Slitter. Most of Voldemort's followers are also similar, and many of the named Slitter students who meet all over the property have parents who are dedicated to the cause of the dark Lord.

Draco, the most prominent student at Slitern, is even the son of one of Voldemort's most prominent followers. Most of the Harry Potter books and films are also shown in incessant light, whether he rejoices his fellow students who are terrorizing by a mysterious creature or laughing as Voldemort followers, struggling a bad family of fog. In the end, he gave him depth to "Harry Potter and Semi-Black Prince", but during the five books and movies leading to it, he is the epitome of any horrible stereotype that people believe in his house.

The other prominent image of the franchise is Severus Snap, a potion professor who spends the first six books and movies of harassing a bunch of children on a daily basis. Snape eventually reveals that it works on the side of goodBut that does not explain why he is so terrible for so many of his students. Even outside his child abuse, we see in retrospectives that he was a pious follower of Voldemort; He did not move to the sides because he found a moral spine, but because Voldemort killed Harry's mother, Lily, the source of Snape's unnoticed. If Voldemort killed another poor woman in the place of Lily, it is unlikely that Snip would take care of.

In today's digital age, the most obvious real life parallel to the house of Slitrin are online echo chambers that throw people down pipelines. Hogwarts' house system throws all the bad children into a house, socially isolates them from any of the good children who could cause their worldview or encourage them to improve. Not only that, but also the children of Slitter who are not racist or evil, it also seems to be rapidly imposed in that direction by the sliters who are.

It seems that the smart choice for Hogwarts, especially after Voldemort returned to another terror reign, would be to dissolve the house of Slitter and disperse his students in the other three houses. Instead of being surrounded by the worst students in the school, they would be the strengths to be surrounded by a healthy mix of personality types. This will help these students grow and mature, and will erase most bad vibrations throughout the school.

Unfortunately, there are structural reasons why this does not happen in any of the books or movies. Slimmers are the richest house in Hogwarts and appear to have no lack of powerful families related to the ministry; To dissolve the house, you will have to spend them first. Then there is the whole number of the world of magic to be incredibly complacent. Even Hogwarts director Dumbledore, the closest thing that the Harry Potter franchise has a clear image, is pleasant with the constant dysfunction taking place in his school. He is ready to question the school sorting system - at one point, that Hogwarts may have sorted children too early - but he never goes so far as to wonder if Slitinin should not exist at all.

The characters in these stories seem to be able to imagine a better world for themselves or seriously rethink the structures of their current society. Of all the characters, only Harry is Hermione tries to change things radically for the betterAnd it doesn't go well for her.

"They are not All Bad, "as" Harry Potter "author FC Rowling in an interview with 2008 A striker. "And, well, far from it. As we know, in the end, they may have (laughs) a little more developed sense of self -preservation than other people. (...) That's the old saying:" There is no truth, there are only views. "

In the same interview, she clarified that some of the similarly returned to the battle of Hogwarts; They simply went to get reinforcements and then returned to help. However, this is not mentioned in the last book "Harry Potter" and of course it is not mentioned in the adaptation of the film. It does not help the Sliters case that the most common thing they have ever done is something that has ever mentioned from the franchise creator in an interview. If you subscribe to the whole theory of the "author's death" of criticism in the media (What is a pretty necessity for contemporary Harry Potter fans), then this explanation does not have much weight.

The clearest proof that Rowling did not intend to be evil with the image of Professor Moldon, who was introduced in the sixth book as a new professor of potions at the school. Madagor is a coward, an elitist and has some ordinary prejudice against students born in Mugl, but according to his credit, he fights Voldemort's last battle in Hogwarts and never seems to be sympathetic to Voldemort's ideology. Also, there are some small characters of Slitterrin that occasionally mean not to love Malfoy or Voldemort, although none of them are missed enough to make an impression.

If there is one benefit Controversial restart of Harry Potter TV seriesIt is that his medium will offer the series a chance to use all those students of Slitirin. Perhaps Draco's TV will be a little less than a wicked beard for his first five years at school, and maybe it won't be, say, accidentally threatening to kill pets. Maybe we'll even be able to see a few similarly hang out with Harry and the gang at some point or will appear in the battle of Hogwarts (assuming the show lasts so long).

Of the main characters of Simitarn, Draco definitely got the most room for improvement here. He is a character who seems to receive a ransom bow in the last two books (or the last three films), but fans had to settle for half. By the end of the story, Draco certainly seems to be disappointed with Voldemort's contract, but he still does not do much to make up for his entire childhood to be absolutely the worst. Maybe there is the opportunity here for the books to throw Draco a little earlier than his nail "semi-blood prince"; Perhaps it grows more complicated in seasons 4 or 5, so when Season 7 appears, we can make it easier to buy a triumphant, redeemed conclusion (again, if the series reaches that point).

It is also possible for the show to double the similarly to be terrible and use it as a justification for disassembling the house at the end of the last season. After over 25 years of the Harry Potter franchise ignoring the elephant in the room, maybe this is time to take a stand and say that Slitrin must go. Either the TV shoot can make the similarly nuanced similarly or it can dismantle their house as a whole; Both could be attractive directions to take the series. It is just the middle path, the status quo-affirmed approach that would be a real disappointment. Restarting the TV has a chance to shake things up a bit, so hope to take advantage of the advantages.