Documentary episode of strange new worlds aims at the biggest problem of Modern Star Trek

This article contains spoilers For the latest episode of "Star Trek: Strange New Worlds".

In the latest episode of "Star Trek: Strange New Worlds" (titled "What Is Starflit Missions. However, Beto has an agenda. He does not just want to lower Starflit; He wants to oppose it. He sees Starflit as an aggressive military organization that is more committed to conflict and violence than peace and diplomacy, despite his claims about the opposite.

Beto's suspicions have proved to be disappointing when it comes to the current mission of the company. The federation, completely confusing, took sides in a war between two worlds that were not federations and agreed to help aggressors, wandering, in their efforts to overthrow their enemies. As a result, the company has been sent to get a space habitat, an alien to the size of stars, which is specially grown to serve as a destructive weapon. Captain Pique (Anson Mont) sees that alien will be a weapon and continues his mission anyway. There are many times when Pique talks about how he and his team should follow the orders, saying that the true nature of their mission is classified. Only through an independent investigation and careful moral again wire, Pique and his officers begin to question the ethics of delivery of the enslaved killer of a stranger to the aggressors of the killing war.

Namely, it has never been revealed how Starfrit has become so deeply involved in the military effort. The Star Trek franchise has always been a glorious property dedicated to pacifism, not violence. War is the ultimate moral failure in the Star Trek Universe, and Starfleet is usually involved only in armed conflict when virtually all other options are exhausted.

But there can be something bigger here. Maybe the writers behind "What's Starflit?" They are trying to comment on the way the Star Trek franchise has become a disturbing violent because it has launched a new life on Paramount+.

The Starweight track in the streaming era has become too oriented towards action

From 2005 to 2017, there was no new "Star Trek" on television. "Star Trek: Enterprise" was canceled, and the franchise was restarted on the big screen by Jey Abrams. The second re -used the characters from "Old Trek: the original series" as younger, sexy, alternative versions of the universe for himself and, in particular, he strengthened the action and violence. He turned Star Trek from a nervous franchise for diplomats and researchers into high-octane shoots. The audience ate it, and the movie "Star Trek" in 2009 in 2009 became a great financial success.

One of the film's writers, Alex Kurzman, also stood behind Michael Bay's action script as "The Island" and "Transformers", so the tonal shift was significant. Kurzman specialized in writing fatty action sequences, while the Star Trek franchise was, before, often quite inconvenient and intellectual. Regardless, Kurzman continued to co-repatch the 2013 "Star Trek Into Darkness" extension before it was at the helm of all Star Trek when the property returned to TV in 2017 on the SBS for all streaming services (which has since been renamed Paramount+). That same year, he co-created "Star Trek: Discovery", followed by "Star Trek: Picard" and several other performances.

These new series did not look different from the classic "Star Trek" shows, but they also felt differently. They accepted a much more aggressive tone, with the first season of "Discovery" directly with the war between the Federation and the Clingons. There were also more scenes of hand struggle, facer shootings and battles for stars, with the protagonists of "Discovery" and "Picard" regularly kill others. Fan web pages They collected the number of people killed by "Discovery" the lead of Michael Barnham (Sonqua Martin-Green), with her killing the counting of an incredible 58 at only 65 episodes.

Violence was the new ethos of the franchise "Star Trek"And the old -fashioned paths like me were shaking. There was too much death for property that was previously dedicated to peace.

Strange new worlds interrogate the problem of modern Star Star Trek violence

This is where "What is Starflit?" Enters. Episode writers seemed to Catherine Lynn and Alan B. McLero, they were interested in questioning violence on Star Trek television after 2017. The title of the episode can be "what is" Star Trek? "" It shows Starfleet (Re: Star Trek franchise) as a given mandate of violence. I feel that Kurzman enjoys action stories more than those of science, suspicion that takes place again and again and in "discovery" and His spin-off film "Star Trek: Part 31." It may have even encouraged his writers to include more firearms, flip -like and otherwise traditional action nonsense.

"What is Starflit?" Pause to ask the characters of "Strange New Worlds" and viewers see what we do here. Is Starfleet (and, after sequel, the franchise "Star Trek") dedicated to military efforts now? Is it really our mission to deliver Super-Alien Badas in a war zone? Or maybe we should pause and doubt what we are doing here? Is our mission one of the military wins, or is it more sensitive than that?

"What is Starflit?" It ends with various characters who praise the title organization as the best example of character strength. Starfleet is not for its missions, as they may be - no matter how good its intentions are - based on the wrong principles, nor is it military power. Instead, it is a conglomerate of the ethical forces of all in it. And, after a sequel, the franchise "Star Trek" is about the ethics of her characters. "Star Trek" is not a violent property, it seems that this episode is positive, but calm. The creatives of the show had to pause and reconsider their actions as much as the fictional crew members of the company. It is really powerful calculation.

The new episodes of "Star Trek: Strange New Worlds" are launching Thursday to Paramount+.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *