This article contains spoilers for "weapons".

The third episode of the fourth season of Seinfeld, titled "The Pitch", descended in history as one of the best and most respected examples of writer Larry David's work. In it, Seinfeld's protagonists - one of which are Jerry Seinfeld, Natural - Fictional NBC Directors on Nothing, which seems to be a rifing of how David and Seinfeld have set the Seinfeld to the NBC. Of course, the concept that the series is "for nothing" is pies, self-deception, one, and was not intended to take literally. However, unfortunately, too many people understood it to the heart, and not only were they considering the idea that Seinfeld was not a show (when, in fact, it was a show for many things), but they considered it to be validation that art could not be for nothing - that not every book, song, TV or film.

This is, of course, wrong. In the same way that the whole art is political, the whole art is for something, and it is just a degree of depth of action in question, not its presence. If there is a genre that is constantly rejected as "not so serious" for decades, it is a horror movie, because people have habitually believed that the genre is everything, without feeling. Fortunately, that reputation has recently turned around, as the horror has become more intense and fans of the genre have made sure to emphasize its credibility as loud as possible and as often as possible. Indy -Horor movement from the early 00 was eventually mutated in the "elevated" horror films that increased only in popularity, films in which the existence of one's own subtext is so pronounced that it is a practically selling point.

It is magical to say that these films have trained viewers to be a spoonful of depth in a similar way as a series of streaming services, to allow people to multitask while watching, but that is not true. There is a problem with media literacy in the heart of the biggest appeal for Zack Kreger's new horror film, "Weapon", However. Complaint Albania - that the film is not for nothing - is invalid criticism, the one that people level the film because they cannot articulate what actually bothers them. The "weapon", like Seinfeld and the whole other art, is really about something, but its structure is so deliberately unusual that it has made it unfulfilled for some people, causing them to make specific claims about its content.