Katy Perry Legal War with a sick veterinarian takes a dramatic order

Chris Pratt unexpectedly found an entangled in Katy PerryLong-term legal battle with US military veterans Carl Westcott Over over $ 15 million Montecito.

Perry and Westcott are locked in a 2020 dispute. Years after the veteran tried to return from sales only two months after he agreed to him. Despite the judgment of the Court in December 2023. who supported the legality of the purchase, Perry later filed a separate lawsuit seeking damage.

Now, allegedly, Chris Pratt is drawn to legal fight because he hired a real estate from Katy Perry, and his testimony will help the Law Center Carl Westcott's a few key issues related to the state and value of the house.

The article continues below the advertisement

Chris Pratt is seen as a 'material witness' in real estate in dispute

Chris Pratt
Mega

Chris Pratt soon could find a witness in the legal dispute of Katy Perry with Carl Westcott, older veterans from whom she bought 1520 million montecit in 2020. years. Years.

Pratt is associated with the case because he rented a home from Perry, although he was unclear when the lease agreement began.

According to the source he was talking The American sunWestcott's lawyers were in court on Tuesday at the moment and can soon move to the Subpoena Chris Pratt as a "material witness" in front of the trial.

Insider claimed that Westcott's legal team wants to establish a time frame when Pratt began renting a home from Perry.

The article continues below the advertisement

In addition, they may interest them that Pratt is paid in rent, especially because the legal case includes Perry who asks Westcott and stating in her submission that the house is not tough.

"Perry asked for millions of dollar damage and claimed that it wasn't Live," Insider said. "(The house) is clearly lived, because the A-leaf actor is rented."

The article continues below the advertisement

Chris Pratt can be overthrown three hours over the property dispute

Chris Pratt Oiant Eminem Song video is re-setting up, a
Mega

If Pratt ultimately he receives a court call from Westcott's lawyers, he can be attended by a deposition of up to three hours.

This was discovered in the documents supported by Westcott's legal team 1. August with the superior court of California.

"Just before the trial in Phase 2, before published by the proof that Perry hired Westcott's property for the actor Chris Pratt and his wife (Katherine Schwarzenegger)" read the documents, which made receivables from a Daily mail Article as evidence that should enable the deposition of Pratt.

The article continues below the advertisement

Alivni Veteran lawyers insist on re-examining the summer house in the middle of using Chris Pratt property

Mega

The documents also discovered that Westcott's lawyers ask the court to allow their expert to implement "a short three-hour reassessment of the property."

The purpose of the visit would be "to see what the repairs were done and the IFINE regarding their reasonable value."

According to the document, Westcott's lawyers believe that only by conducting examination and deposit of Pratt and other involved parties can continue the August trial on the basis of "actual merits".

The article continues below the advertisement

The Veteran son slammed Katy Perry over the property dispute

/// Katy Perry scaled
Jeremy Smith / Imagepace / Mega

Last November, Westcots' son took him to X to criticize Perry to arrive in his father, who is currently bedding with Huntington's disease.

"My family was in the fight against ... Katy Perry and now Orlando Bloom to defend the honor of my father, Carla Westcott, who dies from Huntington's disease," he wrote At that time.

"The privileges of the celebrity, similar to a political lawyer, must be completed. We cannot afford some two-layer justice in America," he also assessed in Tweet.

In a separate post, Westcott claimed that Perry had a "form" targeting people lacking the resources to fight in court.

He quoted a past case in which the singer sued a small business owner who used the name "Katie Perry" for his fashion brand, despite the fact that it was the legal name of the woman.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *