Killing superheroes in the name of justice has been a controversial topic for decades. In 1992, The strange experiment of Tim Burton "Batman is back" It hit theaters and managed to upset the audience at several different levels. The parents (and McDonald's) were attached to the general tone of Burton's nightmare, Gotham, to the extent that Warner Bros. Extecus decided to dramatically change the course with the next film, dropping Burton as a director in favor of Elloel Schumacher. neglected the movie Batman which is more important than you realize). But some fans were disappointed with the "returns" for another reason-namely, that Michael Keaton's Batman was a stone killer who was imposed by a criminal in a jet-nourish and blowing another sky without shaking.
Fast forward in the 2010s and the same debate was among the fans, only this time also included the other biggest hero of DC: Superman. When Zack Snyder took the creative lead for DC and Warner Bros., he introduced us to the Chinese universe that was much darker than we saw before. But this was not the darkness of Burton's magical expressionist fairy tale. Snyder's vision was a gloomy, almost cynical download of the original material that is best characterized by an infamous moment in which The director missed in response to fans' questions about Batman's readiness to kill In "Batman vs. Superman: Dawn of Justice". "Wake up f *** up," the hidden began. "Once you lose your virginity in this movie, and then you came and tell me something like," my superhero wouldn't do it. " I'm like, 'are you serious?' I'm like the way to that. "
Perhaps even more controversial that the dark knight is imposing his victims in Snyder's films was Henry Caville's superman who did the same in the infamous stage of "The Man of Steel" in 2013, in which he adheres to General Zod's neck of Michael. Of course, this did not go well with certain fans of the character, who were previously known as an extremely boy scout. The controversy was moving above the expanded DC universe, otherwise known as Saiders, during its existence and remains the subject of disputed debate among fans today.
Now, the Jameses Gunn has introduced us to all the new, brighter, more light Serbian version of Superman. As such, you may expect him to be one of those who excluded Snyder's murderous superpower, but Gun seems to be with Snyder Bros..
Ams Gun understands why Superman can kill
Superman's Suk Snyder's download was about as much as you could get from Richard Donner's 1978 Superman seminar, which remains a gold standard in Superman's films (and probably superhero films in general). The film is a respected celebration of everything that stands for the character, so it may be surprising that Donner had some strong opinions on Superman's DCEEven going so far as to say, "I think we are in strange, dark days of making movement."
Being forgiven that you thought that Jameseshez Gun, who conquered audiences around the world with his colorful, fantastic, family friendly "guardians of the galaxy", would agree-especially because his vision of the newly-laned DC Universe is a much more light heart than Savers. Gun, who took it as a co-head of DC Studios along with Peter Safran in 2022, now introduced us to his Silly, charming pleasure from the "Superman" crowd, Infusion of the film with "guardians"-humor and a very heart that is the opposite of more cynical downloading of the superhero. But Gan seems to be not actually everything that kills Superman that kills, at least when in defense of innocent lives.
During Wired P&A, Gun answered the question "Why doesn't Superman kill?" By agreeing that the character "believes in the basic right to life". But director Superman then continued to add an important warning: "I'm not a shot in that respect, I think if, for example, he had to kill to protect someone's life, he would probably do it, though it would be difficult for him." With righteousness, Gun does not have to say that he was everything for the infamous "Steel Man" scene of Snyder, but this is tacit support for the idea of killing the SUPS when needed, which certainly means that Gunn at least understood his director.
Superman to be forced to kill, in fact not that interesting
Superman is known for being the main figure of the paragon of truth, justice and "better tomorrow" unless you prefer the slogan from an old school, which ended with the "American path". In any case, the character is assumed to be a deep moral figure that would never kill if you didn't have to. The version of Christopher Reeve did not kill Superman in 1978, although there is some debate as to whether that technically allows General Zod on Terrence Stamp to die in Superman II. But Donner was replaced as the director of that film, and as such, Superman of the 1978 film remains the epitome of the character in popular consciousness - at least for more generations who have grown up with a Reeve as his steel man.
Having this in mind, it would always be controversial to have Henry Caville's Superman to attract the "man of steel" necks, whether the character killed on several occasions in the comic books. Indeed, The end of the "man of steel" was controversial before debuting the filmAs producer Christopher Nolan initially did his best to persuade Zack Snyder to change him. After all, however, Snyder was allowed to realize his kind and, for better or worse, the public was shown Superman who was ready to kill to save innocent lives.
Now, the Jameseshei Gunn has introduced us to "Dorki Good Guy Superman" of David Corpens, who looks like the last person to break his enemy's neck. However, based on Gun's comments, such a thing cannot be completely out of the question. You can also read his answer as tacitly suggesting that it is not really so interesting to investigate this particular point on whether Superman would kill if he was pushed to do so - a kind of "yes, he can be able to do so, but not as fascinating or worthy of focus." Moreover, not only does Superman kill his enemy on the screen, but it would also be a huge boomer if we saw the root version, which must make the same choice in the near future-that can quickly defend the growing DC universe and its more tasty tone. On the other hand, who should say What will happen if Superman doesn't make as much money as "steel man" at the box office...
Source link