The only thing about "Starwells War: The Last Edice" that everyone can agree on is how people No I agree - but that's what happens when you get bold changes in a story. One of the bravest he took by the writer-director Ryan Nsonson was the murder of Snow (Andy Serkis), the supreme leader of the first row and the master of the dark warrior kilogram, not Ben Solo (Adam driver).
Jey Abrams's "Power Waking Strength" introduced Snock as a wicked, shaded figure, but also largely descended on how the galaxy was essentially returned to the status quo of the original trilogy. Smok was a clear analogue of the film with Emperor Palpatin (Ian McDyrarmeed), but how did he never see the villain climb to such a powerful role? The ambiguity has made many fans assume that more information about the rise of Snock will be revealed in the next two films.
Instead, in "The Last Edice", a kilo of Ren is fueled by the abuse of his master and his new relationship with Ray (Daisy Ridley). He kills Snook, who took Ray's light by involving the Snow's strength match and Bisno. A glorious struggle between Ray's royal and kilo and SND (Read our lip history of that battle here).
Many were disappointed with Snook's death - including Andy SerkisWho was "omitted" from the decision just as bad as Snok himself was! Most expected Snock to be the main villain of the trilogy and, in the two years between Force Awakens and Last Jedi, "went Redit Mami" theorized the "mystery" for who really was. It was common that Snock was really unwanted Darth Plageis, late Palpatine master. (Lucasfilm debated it before the "Last Edice" was out.) Serquis himself was also teasing had more to shrink and his scarf look As early as November 2017.
But while fans of the "Starwalks War" were intrigued by Snook's empty leaf, Rihan Nsonson admitted that there was a much more attractive villain. How He recently explained to Rolling Stone:
"In reading the script of Jey, and watching the daily newspapers and watching the power of the driver's character of Adam.
Rihan Nsonson realized that a kilo of Rehn was a villain of the Starwalks War
In a mentioned interview with Rolling Stone, Nsonson was asked about criticism that his film "Undid" is the story set by Force Awakens. This came not only from fans of "Starwell War", but Even the editor of Force Awakens Mary Joho Marks. But Nsonson was no trying to do that. His creative decisions "Everyone was taken by the opposite intention, how to take this story that I wrote, what I really loved, and these characters that I created what I really loved and took them to the next step?" For Nsonson, Snock's murder was to push the image of a kilo of horseradish: "I took me great pain to use (snuk) to the most dramatically influential way I could, which I had to take the character to the next level and set it up and what I could."
Personally, I think Nsonson has succeeded. Serkis is Great As in "The Last Edice", playing it as a wicked and temperamental villain. His two crucial scenes - stunning a kilo of Darth Weider's real estate ("You were unbalanced, best of a girl who never held bright!") And his death - are among the best in the movie. I can understand that Serkis is upset that he was not doing anymore, but in the end I think NSONSON was right that making a kilo of horseradish in the main antagonist was the right move. Unfortunately, this is not what happened.
Instead, Palpatine returned (somehow). It worsened Snook's death in retrospects because it destroyed the initial purpose: raising a kilo of horseradish in the main villain. Instead, the real palpatine is supported for the dead fax palpatin and a kilo of horseradish follows the way for Wader's ransom. Bored!
The ordered used it because Nsonson killed Snow and reportedly left the story without a villain, Abrams "Moral" to return Palpatine to the third film "The Rise of Skywalker". But that's so wrong - because Nsonson built a kilo of horseradish as the villain of the final!
Snock is symptomatic of problems with the "Starwalks War" trilogy
I am more compassionate to the complaints that the character and history of SNONA should have been omitted before dying. Nsonson defended against this criticism Indicating that the original films have revealed nothing about the history of palpatin or how he became an emperor before dying in "Returning EDI". I think it's a little different because the presence of snuk, like ancient evil, feels abnormal to the original trilogy.
But I Also Think that Snock's history research was not a victory situation. There was probably no real satisfying answer to who he was and I think the fixation of the "mystery" fans stems from a subconscious understanding that his character No It makes sense. Snock was a lazy conceived character: Palpatin clone to get involved in a formal story because Abrams is a movie for film cover. Removing from the board was the smartest move. Snow problems, both before and after his death, are Abrams, not NSONSON.
The same thing for the "Force Awakens" such pleasure from the crowd (it is a spiritual remake of the original "Starwalks War") is why it was not a great basis for storytelling. It teases the trilogy of the sequel to "is there, done", narrative and aesthetic. When Nsonson said it was his job to take Abrams' characters and the story of Abrams to the "next step", you could say less that his job was to add depth to them. Snock was so empty in "The Strength Wakes" that you could project something on it (like the rest of the movie). Nsonson admitted that he is not an attractive villain in his place, so it is better to use it as a spring stone for the real villain: a kilo of horseradish.
We saw the story of "Dark Warrior" returning to the light and killing his master before, with Darth Veder. A kilo kills Snock in "The Last Edice", but only to usurp it and fall deeper into the dark. It left the character in the kilo and the story in unexplored territory for the third film. "This won't go the way you think," says "The Last Edice" (through Mark Hamil's Luke Skywalker). Only then does the "rise of Skywalker" turn and says, "Yes, yes, that is, please like us!"
The trilogy of the "Starwalks War" sequel did not need a fight for Bit planNecessarily a consistent creative vision is needed. I would take Rihan Nsonson over Jey Abrams any day of the week.
Source link