"Oh, Hi!" It starts as a Roma-com, but also as a horror movie. We meet Iris (Molly Gordon) and her boyfriend Isaac (Logan Lerman) because they spend a nice weekend in a hidden house outside the city, and during that first day, everything looks suspicious. Indeed, Iris and Isaac seems to be approaching a little Also Well, and we know that this will not be much film if nothing goes wrong.
Finally, a penny falls: while Isaac is lysed with his hands in bed post-coatus, he reveals that he is not ready for a relationship. Iris is confused, because she must have seemed that she and Isaac were already in connection. But Isaac does not see it this way. Despite inviting her for a weekend rest and being romantic with her throughout the first act, he does not see Iris as his girlfriend and has zero interest to allow that to happen.
After this moment, the film's scary monster is revealed: Iris, who refuses to muffle Isaac. Instead, she continues to keep him trapped in that bed until she noticed, as part of the feverish plan to make him realize that he loves her. It is a dynamic that is both terrible and funny: we can sympathize with how frightening this is from Isaac's point of view, but anyone who has experienced emotional turmoil of the modern dating landscape can sympathize with Iris's actions. The abduction is always wrong, but if a guy takes you as much as Isaac does ... Ah, we get the impulse.
What makes "Oh, Hi!" It's so wonderful that Gordon doesn't dwell with his display of iris and Her antiquity of Annie Wilks-ESK directly from "misery". Gordon plays a role that is distorted but still relative. It is especially fun to see that she gives this play because, well, she recently finished the third season by playing Claire on the "bear". That character is a healthier, erboyess and far more mature than the iris so far, and it is a thousand times less interesting.
The problem with modern television is that everyone seems to be on therapy
Clare of the "bear" is a controversial character among the show fans, mainly because he does not feel like a real person. It is presented as perfect in every way that is important, and it represents the healthy, stable life for which the main character Carma (Ereeremi Allen White) both long and scared. The show is trying to give her little moments to point out that there are both her fights and disadvantages, but none of them hold. The "bear" can tell us that Claire is not perfect, but the fact remains that it is incessantly kind, patient and good with the people in every scene in which it is.
All of these are great qualities for real life to have; However, on TV, it is irritating. It may sound counter-intuitive, but if Claire behaved more like iris, she would probably have more supporters in the random "bear". Instead, Claire speaks and acts as someone who was already on therapy, is emotionally self -conscious and tries to improve. Meanwhile, Iris acts as someone who has never been on therapy in her life; It allows her emotions to take the wheel and is not widely aware of how her behavior is encountered. In other words, Iris is a cinema gold, while the energy in the "bear" falls whenever Claire is on the screen. However, it is clear that it is not Gordon's fault; It's the fault of the show's writers.
Why did the "bear" chose that direction for Claire's image? It is part of a larger TV trend of fictional characters to be more mature than they would be 20 years ago. Many viewers sing out "Ted Lasso" as a poster child for this problem, which makes sense: until season 2, almost everyone in that show was cloyingly healthy and communicative. They all did the job to improve, and if they had a problem with another character, they would simply discuss it directly and resolve the question of how adults. That's why I found The character Nate (Nick Mohammed) The villain turned into Ted Lasso Season 2 so refreshing; It was a very needed acidic note in the show that otherwise became painful.
Enough with healthy characters; Return the bad decision making
It's easy to see what this trend has started. There are many TV shows that have frustrated viewers with a lack of maturity of their characters. "Scrubs" attracted its viewers to the Wallid with Protagonist JD (Zack Braf) a permanent flip-flip-flip over his orbuding interest in again/over, Eliot (Sarah Shalke)Just as the "friends" tested the patience of everyone with the drama between leader Ross (David Schwimmer) and Rachel (Ennenifer Aniston). Viewers became ill with conflicts that could be fully avoided if the characters talked to each other as mature adults, and TV evolved in response to that appeal. As a result, the stories of the Ross/Rachel -style sitcom were replaced by those in Jimim's vein (Kron Krasinski) and Pam (ENENA FIKERS) at the Office. Hence, when the will of the show/no one are united for the first time nowadays, they tend to stay together.
Although it is nice to see the characters no longer enter the negligent struggles during silly misunderstandings, their maturity and probability also make them less fun. Comedies are funny when their creatives are not afraid to make their characters as opposed, while plays are more attractive when the audience should not always be on the side of the main character.
The best show that will ever understand this was probably "soprano". That series made his protagonist on the Mafia Tony (Jameseims Gandolfini) to go to therapy, but fortunately he learned nothing. There is even subordination in Season 5 where Tony Janenis (Aida Turturo's) begins to run anger, but Tony - spent by an alubmorrhema of his sister who improves himself - decides to stop it all. It is a cruel, sad moment in the show, but it's also a TV for blocking.
The writers behind Sopranos understood that viewers do not want Jani to put her in the job to become a better person. They wanted to see her continuing to argue with one legs Russian ladies and to expose her Lovebean interests on the stairs. Healthy Janenis would not make for good television, and viewers would not even buy the transformation. Sopranovs have always been comfortable to allow his characters to be the worst, and that is a underestimated part of why he is one of the best (and funniest) prestigious plays of all time.
I don't know what the Claire plan in the 5th Bear season is, but here we hope the Let show writers allow it to be a little less perfect. I don't want to see her keep joking with others about how family can be out of karme control; I want it to enter into disorder on its own. Gordon should not be thrown into the treadmill at the voice level. After "Oh, Hi!", She should always be allowed to be as bad as she wants.
"Oh, Hi!" Now he plays in cinemas.
Source link