The list of IMDB's 250 highest films is an interesting view of the IMDB users' mind. People who are announcing to IMDB to rate, seem to be many fondi -lifeliers for criminals, prisoners or warfare. There is also a difficult contingent of violent fantasy. Almost all movies on the list are about men, masculinity and male problems. The ten films with the highest ranking on the Top-2550 list include titles such as "The Shawshank Redemption", "The Boodtoss", "The Lord of the Rings", "Pulp Fiction", and "good, bad and ugly".

Of course, the 100 worst-ranking films on IMDB are more than a mixed bag. Great films tend to be the films that many members of the audience and critics agree are great. Bad films tend to be individually discovered discoveries, unusual external sides that no one wants to talk about. The classics associate communities. Bad movies feel deeply personal.

Movies can be bad for many, many reasons. Some are bad because they are sloppy, unprofessional and have no budget or talent to effectively communicate their stories or topics, such as "Manos: Hands of Fate" or "Birdemic: Shock and Terror". These types of bad films can be immensely fun, however, as they can be fascinated by the directors' thinking. Other movies are bad because they are inspired by a terrible core idea; They can be competently acted and recorded, but they exist in the service of an unwanted term or stupid concept, such as "Christmas saving" or "Battlefield Earth".

And then, there are commercial cynical films. Study films made by a mercenary, financial reasons. Those who have never struggled to put thought, energy, wit or humor in their own making. "Son of the mask", "alone in the dark", "food!" ... These films are just offensive.

The audience's rehearsal is the films "Friedberg/Selzer" since the late 2000s. Comedy films Duo occupy more places at the bottom-100. No one - no one - doesn't love these films.

To remind the readers, the expelled films from Jason Friedberg and Aaron Selzer's late 2000s were plentiful and cruel. They tend to serve as parodies of slippers of certain genres, only with stupid fingers jokes. Their film "Date of the Movie" in 2006 mocked the then Romkomi such as "Hitch", "Wedding Planner", "Meet the Parents" and "40-year-old Virgin". Their film "Meet the Spartans" in 2008 was pointed out of Zac Snyder's "Overted War" epic "300" (to be fair, "300" guaranteed parody), and their 2010 Vampires movie "Vampires" has taken a specific target to "Twilight".

The other frauds of their hits in all directions at once, tormenting everything that happened to be in the pop -awareness at the time. "Epic Film" Epic Film "in 2007, deleted everything from" Snakes on Aircraft "to" Rocky III ", and" Disaster Film in 2008 "included parodies of things like" Kung Fu Panda "and" Sex and the City "among his fraud of true disaster films and" Armageddon "and" Armageddon ". But the Friedberg/Selzer films make no comment on the state of pop culture and seem to have no positive or negative feelings about what they parody. They only reject popular cinematic images through fried jokes lenses. In a strange way, What they do is the unintentional genius. They boil the cinema to its basic components: just pictures on the screen. Excluded moments that lie in mass consciousness. There is no feeling in the Chinese image. It is mechanical. We can also put a farting joke there.

Critics and audiences hate these films with passion. "Disaster Film" is at the very bottom of the IMDB evaluation list after falling there just days after it was released. Has an grade of 1.9 out of 10. Only critic Jimim Shembre, Writing for the Australian newspaper "Age"He acknowledged that "Disaster Film" made him break.

Also, staining the bottom of the barrel was an "Epic Film", which came in as the 10th movie with the lowest rating of the list with a score of 2.4 out of 10 "Epic film," frustrating, does not fake the true epics, otherwise we will be watching "Satira" or "Ben Hur" or "Lawrence". Instead, the "epic film" is an accident of sending, deceives almost everything. When Friedberg and Selzer were co-writing films like "Spy Hard" and "Terrible Film", they at least targeted (Jamesesheims Bond's films and polished films, respectively). With an "epic film", their goal was everything from the last few years. You can want Friedberg and Seltzter to have more punk sensibility; At least they could scream, angry, in the world where everything sucked.

Their "Date Film" is ranked #24 at the bottom-100, with a score of 2.8. As these things go, "Date Movie" is the best of the draw, though it doesn't say much. It is worth noting that "The Superhero, Spanish Film" and "No other teen movie" are just following the same trend as Friedberg/Selzer and did not write the notorious duo. As such, the very poorly rated "Frightening Film V", "Fifty Shades of Black" and "Head Games" are not their responsibility. These films are ranked on #62, #78 and #94, respectively. After 2000, frauds were poorly received in general. A genre that once includes classics such as "plane! and "Top secret!" It has now been transferred to cinema drams.

"Head Games" and "Vampires Sick" are made by Friedberg and Selzer, and they enter #54 and #55, respectively, both barely carry "the movie Emoji". Few directors are widely hated like this pair and the trend dominated by infected theaters for years. They haven't made a movie from 2015 "The Superfast! It seems, for fraud, the bloom is out of the rose.