Why should the Superman sequel to Jameseims Gun should not display Batman

After about a decade of ups and downs, DC fans have a lot to celebrate right now. Jamesesheim Gunn's "Superman" continues to be well accepted by critics and audiences (You can read the movie review here), and the box office shows that viewers are eager to look at the vibrant, optimistic future for the newly restarted DCU. While Metropolis's future looks brighter than ever, Gotham City is also on a winning streak thanks to the "penguin" he got an incredible 24 Emmy nominations, as well as Matt Reeves to finally deliver his scenario for "Batman Part II".

Of course, speculation about the future of DCCs is widespread. In particular, fans are now more eager than ever to see what a successful and cohesive shared universe in which the DC Comics characters can bring both the film and television. No matter how exciting it is to see "Superger: Womanena from tomorrow" and "Clayface" hit theaters in 2026, as well as "lanterns" that further introduces viewers to the DCC Green Corps, there is still a desire for a suitable "Superman" sequel. The Jameses Gunt teases that it is developing a sequel which is a "kind" sequel to the film, which some are rumored to be the "best world" film in which the steel man of David Corensvet will share the center of attention with Batman at the DCC. Although it is necessary to expand the DCU and eventually introduce a Caped Crusader, I calmly suggest that Superman's "Superman" is not the right move.

The fame of the box office is enticing, but DC studies should avoid repeating history

Although Superman can be the godfather of all superheroes in the history of comics, Batman is of every metrics that is more popular with the main audience. Of course, "Superman: Richard Donner's film" is a plan for the superhero cinema, so much that Marvel Studios President Kevin Jegie sees it before starting work on every MCU movieBut the audience clearly resonates with Batman's Chinese adventures more than Superman. Since the box office, since mid-July 20, 2025, Superman's independent films have earned approximately $ 2 billion, with Zac Snyder's "Steel Man" being the highest solo film after earning $ 670 million globally. As for Batman, his standalone films have more than a doubled colleague of Justice League colleague with nearly $ 4.5 billion worldwide, and Christopher Nolan's "dark knight is rising", ruling nearly $ 1.1 billion.

Superman of Batman Dwarfing in box office played a clear factor why, instead of taking into account the self -sequel "Man of Steel", Warner Bros. decided to chase the unprecedented success of the Marvel studio by bringing it to the sequel, "Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice". Watching the highest treasurer of the film, he became the highest film in which Superman is, and yet only the third film with the highest-role in Batman. The movie featuring the two most famous superheroes in comic history was supposed to make $ 1 billion with closed eyes and hands tied behind, but her untidy quality and divided nature Throw a shadow of the DCE that denominates the reputation of the comic book brand with the audience for the rest of its escape, with the "justice league" less intensified than "steel man" and much of the rest of the Chinese universe subject to reducing the refund. The fact that the movie "Okerocher" with a rating of R, earned $ 1 billion in $ 1 billion While no Superman movie hit that milestone that should tell you enough.

Superman deserves more opportunities to shine alone without Batman

After all, putting Batman in the "Superman" sequel would be an absolute mistake. One of the many editions of "Man's Man" with "Batman Against Superman: Dawn of Justice" is that while the first film has set the basis for further research in the newly established life of Clark Kent (Henry Cavill), with his career in the Daily Planet, and a wider life in the city of Metropolis to Brooke (Ben Affleck). Although it was understandable to introduce elements of this new "Dark Knight", the audience already has a much greater closeness to Gotham City and Lore than they do with the city of Metropolis.

One of the elements of the "Superman" by Jameseims Gan who succeeded (although the film could have used more) was the introduction of the Daily Planet staff and how it works as an essential element not only of the story, but also to the wider events transmitted to the metropolis itself and beyond. Of Course, you have Clark Kent (David Corenswet) and Lois Lane (Rachel Brosnahan) (Beck Bennett), and Cat Grant (Mikaela Hoover) Helped Build Out an Essential Element of Superman Lore That Were Feather Sidelined or Ignored in the previous DCE. (In "Batman Against Superman: Dawn of Justice", Myii Olsen, played by Michael Cassidi, has been killed less than a minute on screen.

It is also worth noting that whether the DCU Batman is, as the Jamesesheims Gunn, a new actor or, as the rumors continue to exist, Robert Pattinson merges in continuitySuperman should be allowed to shine on its own conditions, as Batman was for so long the golden goose for DC and Warner Bros.. DC Studios should strike while the super-train is hot, given the new Gun Gun movie returned to Superman's public perception. If nothing else, it would be a preferred movie for Team Superman and Super Girl. The movie "The Best World" is not a bad idea, but should wait for the appropriate "Superman 2", as well as Batman's debut in a standalone film by the DCC. Introduce more villains like Brainiac, expand it to Lex Luthor (Nicholas Hult) and certainly give us more than the Daily Planet staff. The passing in Batman will only overshadow Metropolis Orebman once again, and since Superman is "MGM Leo" of the introduction of DC Studio (or at least he was in the latest film), Gun and Peter Safran should respect it by keeping it in the center of the world.

Superman now plays in theaters.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *