The judge is overseeing Justin And Blake LivelyThe court case acknowledged that he was not familiar with any of them before their messy legal battle.
July July July July Wednesday said Judge Luis Liman said during an emergency hearing That "celebrity is passing," Per report per published Daily MailThe According to the outlet, the judge said that he did not recognize Lively 37 years old before taking their case.
Liman's statement came after Baldoni's lawyer Kevin Fritz It was argued that Lively "specially was being given special treatment because he was a celebrity."
The judge said that Fritz's "complaints" had a "serious problem", there was a problem trying to deal with the court and if you frame it in language and words that the court is accustomed to the court.
Lyman went to recognize Baldoni and Lively Relevance as a public personality.
"I know well that (Baldoni) is a person in the high profile so so (lively)," he said more. "I told you earlier that before I came to this case, I didn't know who your client was, who was the plaintiff I didn't know. Their names were unknown to me."

In his response, Liman made it clear that Baldoni and Lively's fame did not contribute to his judgment in the court room.
"As far as I am concerned, it is irrelevant to whether they have their celery (status) at this point." So, let your statement well taken that celebrity irrelevant now let's make it irrelevant. We don't need to talk about it. "
Lively Filed a case in December 2024 Baldoni accused of sexual harassment claimed that he created a "hostile work environment" in their cinema set It ends with us And created his "fatal mental crisis".
Baldoni's lawyer "completely false, objectionable and intentionally Salasius" denies the allegations. Soon, Baldoni's Weefer's studios also filed a lawsuit against her husband, lively, Ryan RenoldsAnd Lively preachers are looking for a $ 400 million damage. The case was dismissed in June, including civic extortion, defamation, false light attacks of privacy and other claims.
Baldoni also launched a $ 250 million case with another nine plaintiffs New York Times For the coverage of Lively complaints. A spokesperson New York Times Stated Ours The outlet that earned this year was “the case was planned to protect against the case” which was June also dismissed.
As ready for double justice, Lively recently asked to choose the position of his statement. He was granted a request on Wednesday. The statement will be held on Thursday, July 17, but the 31st was rescheduled on July 31.
Source link