Steven Spielberg's film in 2005 Munich It can be considered the first of the thematic trilogy - call the current trilogy of events - with the celebrity director examining key events of the past to make direct comments on the present. "Munich" was the first part of the trilogy and used the bombing campaign - and the subsequent military revenge campaign - at the 1972 Olympics as a way to comment on the Revenge of Revenge The United States after the 11.09 events. The second part of the trilogy was Lincoln in 2012, a film that flashed back in 1865, which used the ratification of the thirteenth amendment to comment on the same -sex rights of marriage to the present. The third part of the trilogy was 2017 is "The Post", A film that used the Washington Post coverage of the Watergate scandal in 1971 as a means of commenting on the media's attitude with then -President Trump.

But at Munich. 2005 was followed by Spielberg named Avner Kaufman (Eric Bana, based on real life Juval Aviv), an agent of Mossad, who was tasked with monitoring and killing Palestinian operatives who oversaw the above -mentioned Olympic bombing in 1972 and the situation. Anger has been asked to withdraw from Mossad and become a free agent, allowing him to commit murder for revenge, allowing the Israeli government to deny any links. Of course, the actions lead to greater violence and the soul of Avner is slowly eroding. He will finish the film with PTSD. The film was ready for five Oscars, including the best picture and the best director, though not winning anything.

"Munich" is about the consequences of the 1972 Olympics, and it makes the great accompanying work of Tim Felbalum's film in 2024 "September 5", one moment after the moment in which the events of the Olympics hostage were detailed in 1972.

"September 5" has no central protagonist, although he sports some great performances by Peter Sarsgard, Ben Chaplin, Johnon Magaro and Leoni Benes as members of his broad ensemble. Most of the film takes place in the ABC news control room in Germany, as the sports department is used to report a second part, but generally unprepared for breaking, violent news covers a swimming victory by US swimmer Mark Spitz. When Ringvate shots from shots, the sports team realizes that a terrorist attack is taking place. The Palestinian militant group Black September broke into the apartment where Israeli athletes remain and took them hostage. They are demanding the release of hundreds of Palestinian prisoners by the Israeli government.

The ABC crew, consisting of Rown Aldridge (SARSGARD), Offefrey Mason (Magaro), Marvin Bader (Chaplin) and translator Marianne Gebardt (Benes) struggles to cover the event, trying to collect all their journalist, where they were not prepared. Due to the immediacy of storytelling of the film, the audience is witnessing real -time journalistic decisions, including improvised means of approaching the camera to the Olympic village and talking about what media media actually mean in this situation. The ABC crew begins to wonder if covering the hostage situation gives too much power to the hostages. They also start to note that the hostages themselves can see their broadcast, changing their plan of action. Where does journalistic objectivity lies in such a scenario?

Given the current events involving Palestine and Israel, "September 5" is political full, not only in his research on contemporary journalism, but as American journalists treat both Israel and Palestine. The creators of "September 5" could not predict that their film would come so quickly after the events of October 7, 2023.

The story of the story of "September 5" is to use an old word for critics, propulsive. He is trying to show a job in a difficult situation, with panic being reinforced by a strict need to remain professional. It is also a great film for technological anxiety and media historians, as a lot of hidden time is dedicated to large analog panels, buttons, dialing, camcorder and other technology in the 1972 era used in broadcasting journalism. Everything from the story to the TVs feels tactful and acceptable and alive. Someone can be impressed by highly trained sports reporters doing their job well ... even if it fails in the end.

As students in history know, the events of September 5, 1972 did not end up happy. Two of the Israeli athletes were killed during the situation with the hostages. When Black September tried to escape a plane at Munich Airport, with nine additional hostages in tightening, they stalled German police. The nine additional athletes were killed in the following frakes. The airport opposes everyone at the ABC News bureau because they have become so involved in the story, they have lost the sight of human lives to be lost.

Since Spielberg's "Munich" is about the consequences of the 1972 hostage situation and the subsequent massacre, it would be best if anyone watched it after seeing "September 5". The film in 2024 is to cover the story and the details of the massacre. The film in 2005 is for The consequences, violence and political chaos followed. And since Spielberg thematically connects "Munich" with the events of 11.09, he is more or less brings the story nowadays.