In case you haven't heard, TV -Harry Potter's show comes in HBO And a controversial creator JK is included. Rowling. Comments against Rowling Trans cast a shadow of the size of a dementer over the upcoming project, which is one of The main reasons why the series may be destined to appear. That, he said, the author's polarizing personal views are not the only thing that can potentially damage the show's success, as it is known to make unwanted creative changes in the Harry Potter orube.

Since the time of the literary adventures of the "Boy's Wizard", Rowling has returned numerous elements of stories - usually on social media - and killed some of the magic. Wizarding World Lore's posting accessories include everything, from changes to the rear stories of the characters to the discoveries of feces ... And let's say that updates are not universally praised. If Rowling insists on implementing these ideas in the HBO series, it can prove to be fatal by Voldemort that unloads the "Avada Kedawa" curse on an unfortunate victim, and the planned 10-year show of the show can be shortened.

On the other hand, the television series is an opportunity for Rowling to fix some of these mistakes and bring back the magic that Harry Potter made so appealing to millions of people in the first place. Given this, let's look at some of the worst examples of returning the author and set up how to clear HBO's adaptation.

The return of FC Rowling is probably a reaction to the eternal obsession of fans with all Harry Potter. People want to know more about the world of wizard, and while the untold trivia is interesting, some of the discoveries of publishing the author of the author are forced and insincere. For example, did we really need to know that Magic Folk once used his abilities to dispose of his feces before accepting toilet systems in Mugl? Probably not, but it's not even the most significant - or the confusing - a work of information shared by Rowling.

Let's talk about the decision to make a man of Asian descent before she becomes Voldemort's snake. "Fantastic Astswerers: Crimes of Grindelwald" - 70 years before the main Harry Potter narrative - explores the subject, and Rowling has put it on social media work to justify it, revealing that the character is Maledict, ie. person cursed to turn into a creature. Nothing is inherent in order by giving the nags backstew, but the fact that not even hinting at Harry Potter books makes it superfluous. Not only that, but also the withdrawal of nags has also been criticized as a shallow attempt to force the diversity in the franchise that is missing - and that is not the only example of this specific issue in play.

Rowling claims that Hermione's race is not explicitly mentioned in the books, though the passage in Harry Potter and Askaban's prisoner describes her face specifically as white-and-now famous portrait of Emma Watson's image further strengthened this term. The author also did a great job from Dumbledore to be gay, which is not raised in the books. The prevalence is a good thing, but confirming the X (formerly known as Twitter) years later - despite the transfer of the site - makes it meaningless and confusing. (The movie "Fantastic Astswerers" didn't do much with this idea.) So how can the upcoming show make sense to these changes?

JK's attempts Rowling to withdraw from Harry Potter did not land the way he hoped. It should be made an argument that its updates are a reaction to the refusal to allow the story to end, but the author's discoveries are not in accordance with her original storytelling. Fortunately for her, the HBO series is an opportunity to integrate some of these ideas into an attractive narrative (while also burying the nonsense).

Arabella Stanton's casting like Hermione in the HBI Harry Potter adaptation It proves that the creators accept some of Rowling's changes. By putting a young, mixed racing performer in the role, Hermione can now be established as a color person - as Rowling allegedly intended to be - and clear any difficult doubts about her identity. Elsewhere, the show should either legitimize the idea that the nags was once human or, even better, to ignore it. The negative reaction to the withdrawal of the character suggests that the fans were preferred by only a snake, as opposed to an Asian woman who became a pet's pet. But if it must be maledictus, the HBO series should address in a way that is attractive and guaranteed.

Most of Rowling's return stories are unnecessary, but others show a lack of attention to the details. For example, take the performances of Professor McGonagal (Fiona Voice) in the franchisee "Fantastic Astswerers", where it is shown by teaching at Hogwarts in the 20s and 30s of the last century. However, the Pottermor website was approved by Rowling Canon that the character was born in 1935, so how could it be an adult during the "fantastic ASTSVERS" timeline? However, Rowling is known to have updated the professor's history from time to time, and some of them deserve to be explored in the HBO series.

Let's face: Minerva McGonagal progressed when we didn't know much about her. The original Harry Potter books-and their successive film adaptations-portray as a strong, meaningless professor who commands respect simply by being herself. "Harry Potter and the Phoenix Order", which takes place in the mid-1990s, also reveals that she has been teaching at Hogwarts for 39 years to that point, contrary to the aforementioned fantastic Astswerers. The upcoming TV series should adhere to the original plan, but it can also be implemented some of the original Rowling additions to McGonagal's Oreudes to remove the stench of her confusing performances in the films.

Prior to the "fantastic Astswirts" that pulls McGonagal's history, Rowling wrote a biography of Pottermore in which the future Griffindor head was engaged in a farmer for fog, but eventually chose a life of magic to the detriment of romance. It is a tragic story in some way, but McGonagal's decision also strengthened her agency and ambition, making her even more appropriate. Later he found a Love Cuke with a member of the Ministry of Magic - only to die after being bitten by a poisonous tentula. Did we need to know this? Not really, but it's pretty interesting.

The HBO series does not have to dive into McGonagal's original history in great details, but alluding to it should be enough to reject the confusing chaos that is its background in "fantastic Astswerers", while adding greater depth to the otherwise mysterious character. At the very least, it will bring a certain consistency in the time frame in the world of magic - and end the debates of McGonagal fans with the help of Turner while teaching at Hogwarts before she was even born. Rowling has since changed the professor's biography to reflect her performances in "Fantastic Astswerers", despite the books that oppose it, so it may be time to go back to the original idea and leave it.

HBO's "HBO Potter" Series are scheduled for the premiere of HBO and HBO Max in 2027.